I like the idea..... if ECW ever got around to being more than sixty minutes.
Simply put, I feel that if ECW were to add a new belt, then I would need to add another hour to do it justice. Yes, I understand that they don't have tag titles. But they very well could at some point, what with the Hart Foundation forming and challenging for TV time on ECW. The way I see it, even if ECW did have another title, where would they time to make it important?
And consider this dismaying observation.... Where would this belt be defended on pay per view? I can't think of a PPV I'd put this new belt upon, and quite frankly, it's not fair to add a belt to this mixture, when you know it would never see the light of a pay per view throughout its existence. That completely says that the WWE could care less about ECW, and that there's no place for it in the WWE Universe (sorry, I couldn't think of a better word). Already, belts like the US and IC are struggling to find air time on pay per views, and don't even get me started on the Tag Team Titles. To the best of my knowledge, this PPV will be the first time they've been defended all year. And of course you have a woman's title defense once a month. So how would you fit a title defense every month onto a PPV? And what message does that send if you won't even have the belt regularly on PPV?
Maybe when ECW exppands to two hours, I'll agree with you. As for now, there's no fucking way in Hell.