mrfantastic111
Riley Justin
Okay so we always here people say that *Insert name of wrestler* could be the next *Insert name of legend*. You hear a lot of "Oh this guy could be the next HBK", or HHH, or Ric Flair, or Rock, Austin, Hogan, etc, etc, etc. I think because we're always looking for someone to fill the void of the wrestlers that were once on the big stage we sometimes miss the gems that are right in front of us, or in this case - were, in front of us.
I've always thought that a ton of comparisons could be made between pre-2002 HBK and 2005-8 Edge when he was truly the Rated-R Superstar: Both were flamboyant, both had 'boy-toy' personas, both were top-notch innovative performers. If you compare the fluent style that Edge had before his injuries really started to catch up to him, and the perfectionist style that HBK is always credited for having, I think you could definitely make a comparison.
A lot of people say that Ziggler could be the 'next' HBK, but I think that people just keep looking for something better and forget about the good things that are right there on their set every week. That being said, I'm not saying that either one of HBK or Edge is better than the other, but I think that there are substantial comparisons that can be made to argue this case.
I don't often think that there can be 'next' of any legend; hence the reason why they're legendary. Maybe the fact that we're always looking for a replacement for these guys is conveying just how iconic these guys are. I think that Edge himself now is a legend, he's not the 'next' of anybody, simply a once in a lifetime character. I think that whilst we had him we didn't appreciate him enough in his last run. He had an awesome character and was always proficient in the ring. I'd even call his mic skills amongst some of the best WWE has ever seen, just go and watch the 2009 Backlash promo package for his title match with Cena, he talks for three minutes and sells you THREE YEARS worth of their rivalry without anyone else in the video talking. I guess because we associate Edge with PG-WWE sometimes a lot of people don't associate him with the best ever, but I think that whilst you could say he was a great follow up to HBK, Edge is his own guy.
Your thoughts?
I've always thought that a ton of comparisons could be made between pre-2002 HBK and 2005-8 Edge when he was truly the Rated-R Superstar: Both were flamboyant, both had 'boy-toy' personas, both were top-notch innovative performers. If you compare the fluent style that Edge had before his injuries really started to catch up to him, and the perfectionist style that HBK is always credited for having, I think you could definitely make a comparison.
A lot of people say that Ziggler could be the 'next' HBK, but I think that people just keep looking for something better and forget about the good things that are right there on their set every week. That being said, I'm not saying that either one of HBK or Edge is better than the other, but I think that there are substantial comparisons that can be made to argue this case.
I don't often think that there can be 'next' of any legend; hence the reason why they're legendary. Maybe the fact that we're always looking for a replacement for these guys is conveying just how iconic these guys are. I think that Edge himself now is a legend, he's not the 'next' of anybody, simply a once in a lifetime character. I think that whilst we had him we didn't appreciate him enough in his last run. He had an awesome character and was always proficient in the ring. I'd even call his mic skills amongst some of the best WWE has ever seen, just go and watch the 2009 Backlash promo package for his title match with Cena, he talks for three minutes and sells you THREE YEARS worth of their rivalry without anyone else in the video talking. I guess because we associate Edge with PG-WWE sometimes a lot of people don't associate him with the best ever, but I think that whilst you could say he was a great follow up to HBK, Edge is his own guy.
Your thoughts?