Dave Meltzer rates every WMXXX match | WrestleZone Forums

Dave Meltzer rates every WMXXX match

TheOneAndOnlyGOAT

Championship Contender
Order (from lowest to highest rated match):

-14 Way Divas Championship match: *1/4
-Brock Lesnar vs The Undertaker: *1/2
-The Shield vs NAO + Kane: **
-Battle Royal: ***
-Cena vs Wyatt: ***1/2
-Fatal 4 Way Elimination Tag match (Pre-Show): ***3/4
-Daniel Bryan vs Triple H: ****1/4
-Daniel Bryan vs Batista vs Orton (WWE Heavyweight title match): ****1/2






I think DB is the first WWE wrestler to have two four star matches in one night. Both matches were great.

The Lesnar-Taker match was extremely boring and just terrible to watch.

Cena vs Bray was good too.

I also thought he'd give the 6 man tag match a DUD (0 stars) because it was too short.
 
The Diva match was a cluster, but it honestly wasn't nearly the disaster I was expecting. I gave it about 1.5 stars just for being mercifully short and for the lack of utterly mindless chaos that most of us figured it'd be.

Considering how Taker was hurt during the match and obviously not all there, I'd give it a 2.5 to 2.75 stars for the effort. I was also surprised at how restrained Lesnar was because, like a lot of people, I figured Lesnar would just be supremely stiff on Taker. At the same time though, I can understand if people were disappointed, especially given that Taker lost.

I'm a little surprised he rated the six man tag match as well, but maybe he did so only because The Shield went over in such a dominant fashion.

I agree with the rating for the battle royal. Battle royals can be hard to judge as far as ranking or grading. It was better than I was expecting, it didn't just plod on forever as I figured it would and Cesaro winning was a nice surprise.

Cena vs. Wyatt was about a 3.75 stars for me as I thought it featured some damn fine storytelling and Bray Wyatt's character is just so damn fun to watch. It was able to balance out Wyatt losing in a way that didn't cause him to lose any momentum, which was what I was worried would happen.

The tag title match was a lot better than I expected, but he rated it too high in my opinion. I thought it was a 3.25 star bout that could've been better had one or two stronger teams been in the match. For instance, subbing Harper & Rowan for Los Matadores and Goldust & Cody Rhodes for Rybaxel. Had that been the line up, I could see it as a near 4 star bout.

Bryan vs. Triple H seems pretty right to me, maybe 4.5 stars. A lot of action and I like that they didn't try to make the bout look one sided due to Bryan's injury. Sure, Trips got in a lot of offense, but he didn't dominate the match from bell to bell with Bryan only getting in a very brief flurry of offense from time to time.

As for the title match, I'd have to go with 4.75 to 5 stars because of how things were set up. Given that the streak had ended, I honestly had no idea how this match would end. After all, if Taker loses at WrestleMania, then there was no guarantee at all of Daniel Bryan walking out as champion. As a result, every near fall had me on the edge of my seat. Bryan taking the combination RKO/Batista Bomb through the announce table, being stretchered out, climbing off the stretcher, winning the match and leading 75,000 people in a huge "Yes" chant was exactly how the show needed to end. They needed a huge high point in order to balance out the huge shock of Taker's streak ending.

With a total of 8 matches on the card with 5 of them being 3 stars or higher, I'd say Meltzer thought WrestleMania XXX was a success. I'm not at all surprised he ranked Bryan's matches so high. Not that I disagree with him as they were both killer matches, but Meltzer has been a Bryan Danielson mark long before he came to WWE.
 
Divas Match- 1.5* : Was actually surprised by this match, it looked like The Divas really tried to step up and put on a good match but just too many Divas in too short a match to really make anything work. Would have rather seen AJ vs Nattie in a singles match tbh.

Brock Lesnar vs Taker- 2.5*: The match was rough but the shock factor at the end earns at least a star. Probably the most shocking moment in all of wrestling history (which is not easy to do nowadays).

The Shield vs NAO + Kane- 2*: Squash match, but it was booked perfectly by making The Shield look dominant. I really couldn't see this going any other way.

Battle Royal- 3*: A lot better than I thought it was going to be and also booked really well. Get all the nothing talent out of the ring early and have the legitimate contenders go at it for a bit. Some cool moments like Kofi saving himself, even through a "botch"(if you can even call it that) and Cesaro tossing out Show gives it the 3* imo.

Cena vs Wyatt- 4*: Now some may disagree with me, but I grew up watching guys like Ric Flair and Dusty Rhodes who put on stellar matches with just their ring psychology, and honestly, a pure psychological match really connects with the fans. Could Cena and Wyatt have put on a 4* wrestling match? Maybe. But I think the fact that they were really trying to tell a story more than anything, makes this match what it is.

Fatal Four Way Tag Match- 3.5*: Great start to the show and really got the crowd excited for the main card. All of these guys did their jobs perfectly and were just allowed to go all out due to the fact that it was Wrestlemania. About a quarter way through the match, the speed picked up and never really slowed down, it was literally never a dull moment, which is what makes a match really great.

Daniel Bryan vs HHH- 4.75*: Nearly a perfect match between those two. Some old school storytelling mixed in with a stellar wrestling match and the man who should have won, did win. Steph was great in her role as heel manager and the crowd really loved this one. Did we really expect anything else from Bryan and H?

Batista vs Orton vs Bryan- 4.25*: Not much to say about this one, some great spots, booked well with actually having Batista and Orton going at it for the majority, giving us the original main event for a while. All guys did their jobs here and again the man who should have won, did win.
 
Cena vs Wyatt- 4*: Now some may disagree with me, but I grew up watching guys like Ric Flair and Dusty Rhodes who put on stellar matches with just their ring psychology, and honestly, a pure psychological match really connects with the fans. Could Cena and Wyatt have put on a 4* wrestling match? Maybe. But I think the fact that they were really trying to tell a story more than anything, makes this match what it is.

Wyatt was great here in his match but I disagree on the psychology part. The problem I really see in why this match isn't any better than a 3 Star match is Cena.

No I am not going to bash him but the match and feud was trying to be this complex build in Wyatt getting into Cena's psyche.

Problem is I never believed that Cena was getting conflicted in any shape or form during this match. It was just his typical clean cut babyface and not once was I buying it.

Perhaps it's creative wanting to play it safe with Cena's portrayal or perhaps Cena has been playing the same character for almost a decade he just couldn't pull off a convincing performance.

Whatever it was something just wasn't clicking in what the story Wyatt/Cena/the commentators wanted to tell and the actual product.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top