Crazy twist involving KB,X,Tenta | WrestleZone Forums

Crazy twist involving KB,X,Tenta

Couldn't you just bump one of the other threads to hype your show instead of making a new thread every time something new develops on your show?
 
Couldn't you just bump one of the other threads to hype your show instead of making a new thread every time something new develops on your show?

if i did that i couldnt have an exciting headline to draw people in. who gives a shit anyway its the bar room ignore it if you dont like it. you should be happy your a tag team champion and one of MY proteges. ass
 
I didn't say I didn't like it. It's just less annoying when you have one thread were you can promote all of your shows instead of multiple ones.

And yeah, no thank you on being your protege. I'd rather not be anyone's protege...
 
I didn't say I didn't like it. It's just less annoying when you have one thread were you can promote all of your shows instead of multiple ones.

And yeah, no thank you on being your protege. I'd rather not be anyone's protege...

I made the thread and i didnt mean forum protege i meant your in my stable in DCW.
 
..... what the fucks going on here?

If you read DCW you'd know...

Anyway basically KB and X fought over you in a match on an edition of DCW Friday Night Shine. You were the ref and counted both mens shoulders to the mat simultaneously. So the court is waiting on a ruling to see who gets custody of you. As far as the admin goes the rumors going around the DCW lockerroom are that a former or current admin holds the decision to who rightfully owns Tenta. Great Stuff
 
.... Do I have to be a bitch in these things? Seriously, I can't help but feel like I'm a bitch in this whole thing. I'm playing the creative control card here...
 
Yeah Tenta, I don't either. It's all really annoying, whatever it is.

I wouldn't even call it annoying.... He's plugging his thread...

Speaking of which....

Now Open

The John Tenta Memorial for Terrible Gimmicks

AND

Razorback's The Art of Philosophy.

See... I did a plug for someone else... I'm not a selfish bastard
 
I wouldn't even call it annoying.... He's plugging his thread...

Speaking of which....

Now Open

The John Tenta Memorial for Terrible Gimmicks

AND

Razorback's The Art of Philosophy.

See... I did a plug for someone else... I'm not a selfish bastard

Thank you. My last one only really got fromthesouth and Xfear to reply. People must not like Machiavelli very much. Or they're fucking afraid of Xfear's first post in that thread. :lmao:
 
You could apply Machiavelli to basketball.

Let me try.

1) The most important thing for the team is to win the big game, for the teammates get the largest paydays that way.

2) Therefore, anything should be done to get the team a win, barring anything that would get the players mad.

Now, if your players don't mind, you can cheat and swindle your way to the top. Woot woot.
 
Razor just applied Machiavelli to basketball. ROTY contest if officially over.

Can you apply transcendentalism to baseball as well?
 
Razor just applied Machiavelli to basketball. ROTY contest if officially over.

Can you apply transcendentalism to baseball as well?

Let's see.

For the purposes of this application, I am using Transcendentalism as defined by Immanuel Kant, that Human Experience is based on "how things appear to us, not how they are." Basically, how something is seen is entirely dependent on the human himself. As wiki defines it:

Kant's doctrine maintains that human experience of things consists of how they appear to us — implying a fundamentally subject-based component, rather than being an activity that directly (and therefore without any obvious causal link) comprehends the things as they are in and of themselves.

1) The basketball team sees things differently than the crowd will, assuming that the basketball players have a different perspective on how things are achieved.

2) Therefore, cheating in a game is not necessarily bad to them. They have a different perspective on how things went down, so they may very well find it as a good thing.

3) If they see it as a moral good, then the team is fine when the Singer Principle is applied. This assumes that cheating is seen as of lesser moral importance than losing.

There. Kant's transcendentalism AND Singer's Moral Principle in one. You're welcome. :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top