WCW had way too many headliners people wanted to see over charisma lacking robots like Chris Benoit. Rey Mysterio and Dean Malenko have no business being in the World Title scene and Mysterio is living proof of how ridiculous that idea is. Jericho, in my opinion, was the only credible main eventer of the five, and he was on his way up to the higher ranks when he ditched WCW. He knew he could rise up the WWE ranks quick since there was a shortage of established stars there. Benoit and Guerrero, as amazing as they were at wrestling, really had no business climbing the ladder to the World Title scene over guys like Hogan and Sting. Eddie Guerrero or Chris Benoit merchandise would not have outsold Hogan and Stings. They had not proven they could get the crowd behind them, they hadn't done a thing to deserve the spotlight. And nobody wanted to see them, people only wanted to see the NWO (although i'll admit Guererro was my favourite non-NWO guy). And the WZ folk here who say they got sick of the NWO and wanted to see Benoit and Guerrero, these folk are revisionists rewriting their own reason for watching WCW. We all loved Benoit and Guerrero matches, don't get me wrong, but we did not tune in to watch them main event. I loved these guys as wrestlers, they did a great job in their spot at midcard holding audience attention for the real draws. WCW did everything right in my opinion when it came to giving fans what they wanted, that is until Turner started vetoing Bischoff's power. Then WCW was shit, gave fans what they didn't want, and WWE was giving fans what WCW wasn't. It has nothing to do with pushing the real main eventers too much and not pushing mid card guys more. If those guys had been pushed years before Billy Kidman and Shane Douglas were, WCW would have fallen apart MUCH sooner.
Fans come on here and go on about what WCW did wrong in pushing the same old guys. WCW had about 100 guys employed and 15 of them were main eventers and then you had guys like Benoit and Jericho after those 15. They had way too much talent, they could have main event scenarios for years that would never get old with such variety. There was so much opportunity for guys like Benoit and Jericho to get over as they'd face the best of the best in wrestling history. But these same fans rewriting history to jab Bischoff, Hogan, Russo and TNA (by jabbing WCW) are the same idiots who subscribe to WWE 24/7 and watch every WWE DVD. They believe word for word the WWE's rhetorical take on the fall of WCW. They think WCW got stale because guys who could draw worth shit like Mysterio and Malenko weren't main eventing and beating guys like Savage and Luger, but at the same time they don't see much wrong with their WWE product where the main event over the past 6 years has consisted of the 3 same old farts and the 5 same mediocre draws: Taker, Michaels, Triple H, Jericho, Edge, John Cena, Randy Orton, and Batista. These guys (minus the old farts) aren't even in the same league as WCW's Top 12 from a decade ago. (Hogan, Flair, Hitman, Savage, Piper, Nash, Hall, Luger, Sting, Goldberg, Warrior, Henning) and are certainly nowhere near Rock or Stone Cold caliber. The old guys of WCW were still drawing Nitro ratings of 4 when the company fell apart which is still leagues better than today's dimsal 3s. So if WCW was a disaster what is WWE and their 3s? Where did WWE go wrong? And todays WWE guys are not in the same league because they did not have the torch passed down to them by these legends (minus Flair). The WWE guys now are similar to WCW's mid card guys: Benoit, Jericho, Guerrero, Booker T, Scott Steiner. Essentially upper mid card wrestlers who, like WWE guys now, shouldn't have been main eventing every pay per view but since there is no one better developed or around anymore they find themselves stinking up the main event scene wrestling the same guy over and over again like clockwork. WWE doesn't go off the air though even though the entertainment is WORSE than WCW at almost any point in its existence. That's because Vince is and always was invested in wrestling, Turner wasn't and has way more money from much more profitable business sectors. End of story. WCW folds because Turner has bigger fish to fry and larger sums of money to make in entertainment sectors with bigger payoff ceilings.
It's funny. Complain about the variety of legendary wrestlers in WCW over 10 years ago but conveniently ignore the more immediate pissoff that is WWE's stale World Title scene. I was just reading wikipedia's version of the demise of WCW and rarely anywhere does it quote the man who ran WCW, Eric Bischoff, but instead quotes WWE's Monday Night Wars and WWE's The Rise and Fall of WCW. Supervised by the McMahons, purposely crafted by highly paid script writers and propagandists hired to twist truth to erroneously make sense of a company they never had anything to do with. Those under WWE contract, those looking for work in a field that was essentially monopolized by WWE, and those with axes to grind with Bischoff and Hogan and all the other WWE turncoats (Russo, Jarrett, Savage etc) were the only ones coming forward to give their two cents worth (and were edited saying only what supported the video's offbase focus). The video's purpose was to paint a picture of loyal good guys like Taker, Michaels and Triple H saving WWE from the evil poisonous bad guys like Hogan and Bischoff who tried to put WWE under but instead put themselves under by overexposing themselves. Poor guys like Stone Cold, Mick Foley, Eddie, Jericho, Benoit who were underutilized or cast away for no reason by big bully Eric Bischoff and Hollywood Hogan when in reality WWE home video will make you believe that all along you all wanted to see fatass Mick Foley in a main event scene he had no business ever being in or boring Chris Benoit wrestle a 5 star match that in 1998 would have put the audience to sleep. Yet today's generation buys it, and so do a lot from mine looking back in hindsight and realigning their opinion to match the blatant WWE agenda they've read here on WZ or heard they're friends regurgitating for over a decade. It's blatant propaganda, blatant lies..its a blatant misrepresentation of history that appeals only to old WWE diehard dumbasses who have always hated WCW and today's generation of ADDers who don't know any better and can be swayed to believe whatever a higher authority with a money-making, power-maintaining agenda wants them to. Yet it still makes its way onto wikipedia as legitimate 100 percent truth that will stand forever for generations of wrestling fans. Folks, lies evolve in one decade to this point, imagine in 100 years how offbase the truth is going to be about anything anti-WWE. It's sick.