Conspiracy Theorists | Page 2 | WrestleZone Forums

Conspiracy Theorists

Without a doubt, man. I have the CL mod on my team. I'll go retreat into a corner and you can do all the work. We'll split the win credit 50/50. :lmao:

Seriously though, I have been looking for a reason to get back into the CL and this could very well be it. I love how excited FTS is getting over it though.
 
So, it's two on two and I get the foreigner.....awesome!!!

Dave, we're gonna crush them.

What, wah? Does that mean I'm on Xfear's team? Or were the teams chosen when I wasn't paying attention? :(
 
Just the natural divide of the room, Razor.

EDIT: Yes, you are on X's team.
 
I knew I should have put this in the Cigar Lounge. I didn't think my post was long enough, compared to the novels that are usually posted in there :lmao:.

The Pentagon thing is kind of sketchy, but there's no way the government could've put bombs in the WTC. Someone would have noticed. And if it was an inside job to give us an excuse to go into a war on terrorism, then we could've just said that we suspect they have weapons of mass destruction, and we would still have been able to go in there and fight. Also, why would we kill our own? There would've been much less fatalities if we had just sent planes or dropped bombs into a location near the White House. It would still look like terrorists were sending warnings, and Bush could've used the excuse that "he's being proactive". I'm not a big Bush fan, but I will give him credit for reacting to the September 11, 2001 attacks in the best way possible. As I said earlier, Bush is simply not smart enough to be able to pull that off without being caught. If Clinton couldn't hide getting a blowjob, then Bush couldn't hide this.
 
The Pentagon thing is kind of sketchy, but there's no way the government could've put bombs in the WTC. Someone would have noticed.

Right, because the government doesn't intimidate people into silence anymore. Bush and Cheney were such a ethical duo. :rolleyes:

And if it was an inside job to give us an excuse to go into a war on terrorism, then we could've just said that we suspect they have weapons of mass destruction, and we would still have been able to go in there and fight.

That's not a legit enough reason back then. We would have said "And? They're not going to use them on us." 9/11 showed the Americans that the Muslim Extremists would actually attack us. Thereby making any war in the Middle East instantly easier to gain support for. Pearl Harbor 2.0


Also, why would we kill our own?

FDR purposefully let Pearl Harbor occur to drag us out of the Great Depression AND get us involved in World War II. The United States government isn't above killing their own citizens.

There would've been much less fatalities if we had just sent planes or dropped bombs into a location near the White House. It would still look like terrorists were sending warnings, and Bush could've used the excuse that "he's being proactive".

That's not nearly as big as passenger jets being crashed into the World Trade Center and having 3,000 fellow Americans killed. When you're already plotting a terrorist attack against your own people, the amount of people killed doesn't really matter all that much.

I'm not a big Bush fan, but I will give him credit for reacting to the September 11, 2001 attacks in the best way possible.

How so? Using it as a further excuse to invade Iraq, a country that had no ties to the 9/11 highjackers or nuclear weapons?

As I said earlier, Bush is simply not smart enough to be able to pull that off without being caught. If Clinton couldn't hide getting a blowjob, then Bush couldn't hide this.

You're forgetting Cheney and the massive web of secrecy that is the CIA and FBI. Cheney is creeptastic, and certainly capable of piecing together a plot such as this.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top