I had made a topic about it yesterday, but it got taken down in case it would attract more spoilers, here is the post like it was made.
To the mods: If a broad thing like this is considered a spoilers I am sorry, but I want to use that to create a new discussion and I really hope it would not be considered a spoilers. I asked some mods and one person told me it shouldn't be a spoiler so I will go ahead, if that's a mistake I am sorry.
For people who read the spoilers you already know and this thread is more directed at you anyway, for those of you who didn't read them don't fear I don't intend to REALLY spoil anything. When they were tapings Smackdown! it was reported that a wrestler was bleeding really bad, the trainer came down to clean him but he was still bleeding heavily.
HHH lately said about the PG era that they had to pull back on the edgy stuff after the attitude era to be able to do edgy thing again. Making the environement so clean that small things like ass being said on TV and other things like that would sound edgy.
Do you guys think that the WWE, knowing that people don't watch Smackdown! as much as Raw because it's Friday and people just read the spoilers instead of watching, are trying to lure people with blood on Smackdown! since it happens so rarely that people would want to watch just to see if WWE will let blood happen on their program.
Heck, even I feel like watching at least that segment to see if they allow blood and I am not even a guy who want blood back on TV that much, I have nothing against it in big PPV match like Hell in a Cell and things like that.But when you think about it, Hell in a Cell only has 2 weeks of build up, if there's blood on WWE TV it may bring people to order HIAC to see if there will be blood, because for a lot of people (myself included) the brutality of the Hell in a Cell just don't come across good without blood.Do you think it was an accident or that it was done on purpose? And do you think WWE could use "shady" technics like those to lure people?