Ill remember that tidbit for the future whenever anyone mentions the likes of Heenan, Albano, Cornette, Hart, etc..... But first I am gonna call bullshit on that. If the advocate/manager is enough of a factor to be allowed at ringside in the tournament, then surely you should count all of what he does in favor of his wrestler. If interference can be taken into account, why ignore promos when comparing two opponents careers? Undertaker has barely said shit during his career & Kane was a mute for the first part of his- so does that mean we discount all those great Paul Bearer promos when talking about those two? Bearer was the shit & his mic skill certainly helped their characters, so are we not supposed to count that in their favor? Heyman and Lesnar are a package deal & it is just silly to ignore their dynamic.