Барбоса;5285883 said:
That's all perfectly fine but there is some valid criticism to be meted out too as Bret also comes off as someone who doesn't like anything. "4/10" has become a meme for him for a reason.
If you watch the interview, you'd see how positively he speaks of CM Punk and his aspirations of becoming a UFC fighter towards the end of it.
The thing is, interviewers don't seek out positive information, they want the negative stuff because that's what will garner juicy headlines and will make people seek out the original content. So every time Bret does an interview, he will be asked certain questions that he will undoubtedly have a negative response, since the media knows he's such an open and honest person.
Also, the 4/10 thing was funny AND true. That Wrestlemania Brock/HHH match sucked (worst non-squash match Brock has had since returning, by far) and it's universally agreed upon that that feud lasted way too long and should have never happened past their Summerslam match.
Nothing or no one is good enough. No one is/was as good as him.
Well, to be fair to Bret, no one really is. The person to come closest or maybe even surpass him is Kurt Angle, but he ruined his career with this 10 year stint in TNA.
And with that said, Bret has been very complimentary towards a lot of pro wrestlers, let's not act like he disrespects everyone. But what headlines will it make when he has something nice to say about Punk, Bryan, Angle, Nash, Undertaker, etc.? That doesn't make headlines, but as soon as he opens his mouth with his true opinion on a shitty HHH/Brock match, it's on every single trashy wrestling site. Had he said the match was great, 10/10, would you have read about it? Most likely not. In that same interview he gave very high praise to the Punk/Taker match on that same card if I recall correctly, but no one remembers that, just him shitting on HHH vs. Brock (which, again, deserved to be shitted on).