Bret Hart Speaks Out On Tyson Kidd Injury

Ban The Buster?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Undecided


Results are only viewable after voting.
I don't normally comment, but when I see glaring inaccuracies I need to.
Droz was not injured in a ladder match, it was a botched running powerbomb during a smackdown taping, Hogan was never almost paralyzed by a tombstone that is just a myth / backstage politics story.

Shiet, looks like I gotta do some research. Still though, proves my point even more, should the power bomb be banned because D Lo botched one time? As for Taker/Hogan, it's not really myth... Hogan still claims that Taker hurt him with the Tombstone although there are many doubts. Point still remains, a move shouldn't be banned because one person was injured taking it.
 
Yah it really is too bad for Tyson Kidd,he is an extremely talented wrestler and hopefully this is must a minor injury and he will be back sooner than later.. I do recall Bret to his credit saying the same thing about Owen injuring SCSA when he delivered his piledriver at SS 97.

As far as Samoa Joe's Muscle Buster it really its not that dangerous of a move not more so than any other. Joe cradles your head in his arms.. It could have been all the wear and tear on Tyson's body and something flukish happened who knows.. To my Knowledge Samoa Joe has never injured someone with his finisher but these things happen unfortunately.. Pray for a speedy recovery for Tyson
 
Impossible to know but he may have had a previous neck injury and has been working through it. It's pro sports, you miss some time you may not get your spot back so you try to deal with it. A fluke, totally possible since the way Joe did the move nothing stands out as done wrong. It is a vicious looking move but I don't see a reason to ban it.

I don't think the WWE is happy with Bret saying Bryan's career is over and not coming back since they have kept his injury really under wraps.
 
Don't normally post, but saw some pretty stupid comments on the first page that I really upset me and thus I logged in. Owen Hart injuring someone with a move does not mean that Bret can't comment on bad moves, preparation and botches whenever he wants, that's just mind blowing to be said. He isn't his brother. Secondly, even saying that "to be fair" Bret commented on Owen's ddt being sloppy is stupid too, it's not needed to be fair, because Bret is not on trial at all over Owen even if he hadn't said anything about the DDT.

I don't really think the Muscle Buster is a bad move, but what's more important is the blatant ignorance and disrespect on the first page, people acting like their on a higher ground than Bret.
 
I would not ban the muscle buster but I accept the fact that Bret is very wary of move botching. The fact that he very clearly has revealed the truth about the conversations surrounding Owen 3:16 despite the fact that Owen is his dead brother should surely illustrate the fact that he's not above calling out family members. I watched some retrospective show or other on the Network recently and they took great pleasure in repeating the clip of that horrible jumping tombstone that Owen did. Owen is my favourite wrestler of all time but still to this day I still wonder at what point which part of him thought that was actually a good idea.

As for Kidd, I can't honestly see how one move which has more of a suplex effect as opposed to a piledriver effect could be solely responsible for the spinal injury. I'd be more inclined to suggest that Kidd's ring style over the years set the groundwork. He's a similar size to and wrestles a similar style to Daniel Bryan and Dynamite Kid (hence the name, surely). I think that's probably the main issue. Wasn't there another Canadian guy like that too? Forget his name. Looked a bit of a psycho, had a gimmick where he set out to incapacitate people. It'll come to me.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,834
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top