Author Spotlight: Chuck Palahniuk

Dexter

Undercardbob Jobberpants
For the uninitiated, Chuck Palahniuk is the guy that wrote Fight Club upon which the movie starring Brad Pitt and Ed Norton was based. And yes, as is true 99% of the time, the book is far better than the movie.

Palanhiuk (CP from now on, as his name is hard to type) is primarily known as a "transgressional fiction" author. That's a rather new genre in which the protagonist is generally some sort of social outcast for whatever reason (deviant personality, interests, appearance, etc) and acts out against social norms as a form of redemption. CP's novels tend to focus on the theme of rebellion against consumer culture, as exemplified by "Project Mayhem" in Fight Club.

The best way I can describe CP's writing style is "the complexity of mastering simplicity." He uses fairly limited, rather than flowery and overly descriptive, vocabulary and imagery. In other words, he writes in a conversational tone, the way a normal person might speak if they were telling you a story. His simplicity masks a mastery of language, however, as his snappy, energetic tone draws you in and connects you with the characters. He then uses that connection he's established to, for lack of a better term, shock you.

Therein lies one of the major criticism's of CP's work. It's incredibly graphic and often shocking, even to those who might think they're desensitized to that kind of thing. It's easy to be desensitized to something when you're detached from it, but as I mentioned, CP's strength is his ability to emotionally connect you to a character. Once emotionally invested in a character, it's almost impossible not to be shocked when that character is involved in something horrible... either as the instigator or the victim. In that way, he forces the reader to confront the shocking topic on a more personal level.

That's what's so polarizing about CP's work. It's cliche, but you're either going to love it or hate it. The things some people criticize him for are the very things his fans love about him. For that reason, among many others, he's one of the most important authors of my generation.

Suggested Reading

You can't go wrong starting with Fight Club since that's his big hit, but if you were to only read one Chuck Palahniuk book, I'd recommend Survivor. It's the story of a man who grew up in a Branch Davidian-like religious cult and spends the rest of his adult life attempting to escape his past. The book begins at the end (the page numbers even count backwards)... he's hijacked a commercial airliner and is about to crash it into the Australian Outback, so obviously he's failed to overcome his past. We spend the rest of the book finding out why.
 
Chuck Palahniuk's all right. He writes like Don DeLillo: short, staccato-like sentences that are a pain in the neck to grasp the first time you read them. His plots are interesting, but you can find similar material in the books of Bret Easton Ellis and Kurt Vonnegut, who, in my opinion, are much, much better writers. If you are interested in Palahniuk, I suggest reading Haunted or Snuff. His best book is probably Choke, with Fight Club a close second. You can skip Invisible Monsters, Survivor, Lullaby, and Diary. I haven't read Rant or the new one that came out this year.
 
Rant was... interesting. I don't know what else to say about it. I recommend it, but I'm not saying you're going to like it. I know that doesn't make sense, but quite frankly, neither does the book.

I can't believe you'd suggest skipping Invisible Monsters, Survivor, and Lullaby. Those are his three best books. Lullaby is one of those books that really makes you think. If you had the power to kill someone by simply looking at them, would you be able to not use it? Survivor I already mentioned, but I'll say again, I fucking loved that book. Invisible Monsters... ok, I'll grant you, that one isn't for everyone but I enjoyed it. It's his funniest book, but the humor doesn't diminish the fact that it really has a point to make, and it makes it convincingly.

The one that came out this year is Pygmy. I don't recommend that one. I'm not saying it was bad, but it was very difficult to read. He wrote it from the perspective of a character that speaks very broken English, so it's difficult to read. It's a decent story, and I appreciate that he tried something different with the broken English narrative, but it just turned me off entirely and brought me right out of the story.

If you're making the argument that CP isn't doing anything that hasn't been done before, I'd agree with you on a fundamental level but then, realistically, who IS doing anything that hasn't been done before? He's still entertaining and damned fun to read.
 
I happen to think Palahniuk is very original. I just don't think he's a good writer. Palahniuk should, more than anything else, be read for the shock factor. Where else will you find two pornstars whose loins are melted and fused together or a guy who has to eat through his intenstines so that he doesn't drown? The novels I said to skip are, in my opinion, just as mediocre as Palahniuk's other work, but they're nowhere near as gasp- or cringe-inducing. If you want fiction that's just as visceral and graphic but that's written much better, go with Bret Easton Ellis. If you want fiction that has just as morbid a sense of humor but that's written much better, go with Kurt Vonnegut.
 
Kurt Vonnegut is an insanely good author that deserves his own thread, and if no one else starts one, I will. But I don't see how he compares in any way to Chuck Palahniuk other than the fact that they both have off-beat senses of humor.

This is the second time you've brought him up in the context of "read him, he's better" and I'm just not seeing where you're getting that. Yeah, Kurt Vonnegut probably IS the better author but in a completely different sense. It's an apples to oranges comparison. Palanhiuk is about story, style, and yeah ok... shock value. Vonnegut is, for lack of a better explanation, our modern St. Thomas Aquinas or Plato.

Can you explain to me how the two keep getting brought up together?
 
I would have to look at the specific passages, but they both employ repetition in their work (e.g., while Vonnegut writes "And so it goes" and the Yon Yonson limerick multiple times in Slaughterhouse Five, Palahniuk writes about "the came behind the camera behind the camera" multiple times in Haunted) and they both also find humor in situations that most people would find either repulsive or mortifying (I don't think I need to elaborate on this one).

But, in terms of general mechanics and style, no, they are not similar. However, Palahniuk is very similar to Don DeLillo in these aforementioned aspects.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,837
Messages
3,300,747
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top