IrishCanadian25 said:
Justin, you're saying that Pantera put metal "back on the map." I am not sure how much I'd agree with that, but lets assume for arguements sake that is the case. STP was one of the pioneers of Grunge Rock. In fact, if Ozzy, Maiden, and Preist are the triad Gods of Metal, then Nirvana, Pearl Jam, Soundgarden, Alice in Chains, and STP are the Pentagon of Grunge. And Grunge was brand new - not a redeux. But for your sake we'll call it a push.
Pantera helped revitalize metal in the 90s when grunge was at the top of the charts. Pantera was almost the only thing keeping Metal alive when alternative rock, grunge, and rap were dominating the charts. Stone Temple Pilots were just playing off the current trend at the time of playing alternative/grunge type music, because that's what was popular at the time. Pantera was staying true to their metal roots and putting out quality music while STP was copying Soundgarden and Pearl Jam.
IrishCanadian25 said:
You've also chosen to play the martyr card. Yes, Dimebag's death was a terrible tragedy, but his death didn't make them a better band. Phil Anselmo's death would have made them a better band. (joking.) But had Weiland died for whatever reason, I think there would have been a similar cry. In fact, moreso, since STP's musical reach was far larger than Pantera's in terms of fan base.
I don't think so. Dimebag is celebrated by fans and musicians alike, not just because of his amazing guitar playing, but because of his personality. He was a nice, fun loving guy that got along with pretty much anybody. The same can't be said for Scott Weiland, whose had many personal problems with people, and of course the drug problems. While I think Weiland's death would be looked on as a tragedy, I don't think it would've had the same impact as that of the late Dimebag Darrell.
IrishCanadian25 said:
Justin, you listed 4 mediocre bands that spawned off of Pantera. STP spawned off a decent band in "Army of Anyone" and of course "Velvet Revolver." Do you know why STP spawned off less bands than Pantera? Because they stayed together longer and reassembled faster.
Have you actually listened to those bands? While I'll agree that Hellyeah and Superjoint aren't the best, they're better than mediocre. Damageplan was good for what they were, and I think they would've been better if were able to put out more than one album. And Down is AMAZING. I question the music taste of anyone that thinks Down is mediocre. They are what rock/metal should be, unlike all the stupid emo bands out today. They put heart and soul back into music, and make it sound good. Every single person in that band is filled with talent.
And then you have Army of Anyone, a band that sound like all the other bands coming out today. I will admit that they're okay, but nothing special. And Velvet Revolver is only any good because of Slash. I'm not really interested in their music, especially after seeing the video for "Slither" where Weiland is running around dancing like a fairy in tight silver pants. Nothing compared to Down.
And another point I have to make is that STP wasn't together longer. They were together from 1987 until 2003. Pantera was together from 1981 until 2003. And granted Phil didn't join until 1987, but that would put them together for the same amount of time. The only difference is that Pantera doesn't have a chance to reunite like STP recently did, because of the murder of Dimebag Darrell.
IrishCanadian25 said:
I was shocked that you went the mainstream rock route with Cowboys From Hell and Walk. SHOCKED that anyone would take the mainstream arguement with them and Pantera against STP, so this may hurt a bit. CFH and Walk, and for your sake let's add Cemetary Gates since that was the hit song off the popular Demon Knight Soundtrack. HELL, I'm in a good mood, I will even give you "Five Minutes Alone." That's 4 "mainstream" rock songs that were only so mainstream outside of the metalhead subculture.
Stone Temple Piots- Plush, Creep, Sex Type Thing, Wicked Garden, Vasoline, Interstate Love Song, Dancing Days, Lady Picture Show, Trippin' On a Hole in a Paper Heart, Sour Girl. GAME OVER.
Well you could also add "I'm Broken", "This Love", "Drag The Waters", and "Revolution Is My Name", but that's not really the point. Pantera is looked at the way they are because they were able to get to #1 on the Charts with little or no radio airplay. Pantera was a band that could sell without the help of radio and MTV, which they had very little of throughout their whole career. The same can't be said for STP. If they didn't play grunge, and if it wasn't for the popularity of Nirvana, MTV wouldn't have played STP. STP was just following the trend that all bands at that time except Pantera were. All the hits they came out with were promoted all over the place, and almost thrown in your face, while Pantera wasn't played at all.
IrishCanadian25 said:
Many of the shows on their HUGE 2008 tour are sold out right now. Fair seats are going for $90+ on Stub Hub. Do the research. Every major local radio station has been doing STP ticket giveaways for WEEKS now. Nobody's excited? Are you kidding? People are thrilled they are back together! I guess those are the same people who propelled the debut album "Core" to go Platinum 8x in the US and 2x in Canada. Pantera's best effort? Vulger Display of Power. Platinum 2x. But yeah, they're more mainstream.
Of course they're sold out. Everyone wants to see STP back together. It's nostalgia at it's finest. If Dimebag wasn't dead, and Pantera were to get back together, I think it would be just as big, if not more so. And as for the amount of albums they've sold, STP played a more popular kind of music, so of course they sold more albums. Again, STP was playing the trendy kind of music at the time, while Pantera were staying true to themselves, and still selling albums with a type of music that wasn't nearly as popular. I think that's more impressive personally.