Thanks for bringing facts and logic to these discussions. Here's also WWE's latest ratings:
http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/504021-big-show-and-mark-henry-segment-scrapped.
It's virtually a fact that Lesnar is not a huge draw, nor has he ever been. He's a poor man's Goldberg.
I would like for someone here to post ratings numbers and draw ANY kind of correlation/causation between spike in numbers and Lesnar's appearances. If you're going to tell me that Lesnar causes a small spike just because of his scarcity at WWE, then I'd be inclined to agree with you. But that's...
So you're totally cool with a guy who has dedicated 99.99% of his time to WWE, stepping down. But you want a guy who works 3 shows a year and draws questionable ratings, to be the face of the WWE? Seems to be you don't understand how businesses operate. You'd have a point if instead of Brock you...
No offense but you have to be dumb as all hell to claim Lesnar is WWE's biggest draw. Even if I ask you to prove it by finding the numbers, you won't be able to because they don't exist. Lesnar's current psuedo popularity has less to do with him and more to do with a lack of talent in the upper...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.