Biggest reactions, check. Top merch seller, check. Good wrestler, check. He's clearly at the top. Reigns is excellent inside the wrestling ring. His talking is his weakest point but Reigns said five words after Mania in a fifteen minute segment and got a louder reaction than anyone has in years. That's top guy stuff. And, it's not real. There is no best. It's a made up sporting league. The best is whoever the audience responds to, sells merch, draws rating and Vince McMahon decides is the best. Bullshit. This isn't true. Dean Ambrose has never received a bigger response than Roman Reigns. Find me footage of this. Get me two instances, one of Reigns and one of Ambrose, from the same time period where Ambrose gets a bigger reaction than Reigns. The two biggest stars fight for the biggest belt. That's how combat sports work. It's been done for over a hundred years. If you take the title off Brock, it'll kill the title belt at Mania. Guess what, Lesnar/Reigns is your main event. What a way to kill the credibility of the Universal Title for it to not main event to Lesnar/Reigns while they fight over no belt. What you're arguing is that the WWE should make their biggest match, two years in the making, less important by removing the World Title. Instead of heaving a potential dual clash of champions, title vs. title, never seen before, history in the making, it should just be two dudes fighting over nothing? Wow, thank goodness you're not running this company. Again, it's clear you have no idea of marketing to an audience. So you'd sacrifice the main event of WrestleMania, the biggest PPV of the year, for Summerslam (not the biggest PPV of the year)? Yeah, that makes total sense. Because in the history of the WWE, someone refusing to do something Vince asks them has worked out with them doing well like Lesnar has. This is such a dumb statement, mate. He does give. He shows up when he is required. I don't know how you're blaming Brock when he literally an employee of a company. He doesn't get to defend the belt when he wants. It's not an actual title belt. It's fake. Vince decides. You're acting like this is real and Brock is holding the belt hostage like it's MMA. So, you completely missed the point. You're in a minority which means as a business, who cares what you think? If I make ice-cream and 10 people love chocolate ice-cream but 2 people hate it and want strawberry instead, I'm not going to stop making chocolate ice-cream. Complain all you want but Lesnar/Reigns are the two biggest stars in wrestling. That's your main event for Mania and it's for the belt. Any other decision would be stupid. Based on the measurable metrics available, that's the match to make. Not by who you think is the best wrestler because they can do flips or because you think Brock is lazy, by the measurable factors we have, Lesnar/Reigns is the biggest match WWE can make. He will because it's the main event of WrestleMania. Again, it's not that hard to comprehend. It would be the same if anyone else was in that situation. Again, Ambrose was never as recognized as Roman Reigns. He might've got more cheers but the volume of response was far less. If people can't get over while Reigns is pushed as the top guy, that's their own fault. AJ Styles lost twice to Reigns on PPV and became one of the biggest stars in the WWE. Your point is flawed. AJ did it, he thrived working with Reigns and became a bigger star because of Reigns. Rollins became a bigger face by working with Reigns. Reigns has helped more people than he has hurt.