Brock Lesnar or Jinder Mahal? They are both pretty bad and I don't know if one is any better than the other. Brock Lesnar has held the Universal Championship for nearly 7 months and has, if my memory is correct, only defended it three times. He defeated Samao Joe, won a Fatal 4 Way against Joe, Roman, and Braun, and then defeated Braun in a one on one competition. And as we know, he will not be defending his title at Survivor Series. Chances are we won't see him defend a title for the rest of the year, which means three title defenses in around nine months. His quality of matches is nothing to write home about either, the man does about three or four variations of the same move. On the other hand, Jinder Mahal is...well...Jinder Mahal. He shouldn't even be near the WWE Championship that has been held by the likes of Hulk Hogan, Bret Hart, Stone Cold, and the Rock. He has held the WWE title for just over 5 months and has defeated the likes of Randy Orton and Shinsuke Nakamura. Up until his latest defense against Shinsuke, he had yet to win a match cleanly. As much as Brock pisses me off (never defending the title and not even helping out at TLC), his reign has to be better just because he is more believable as a champion. At this time last year we had Kevin Owens and AJ Styles as the respective champions. Lord how I miss those days.