Elliot Rodger or Dylann Roof? Knowing how Dylann Roof got a free Burger King meal on his way to prison, I wonder if Elliot Rodger would have gotten the same meal treatment if he was arrested? Dylann Roof (2015 Charleston, South Carolina church shooter) after he was finally taken to custody after having been on the run for days after shooting a church taking down nine black people. His on-the-run adventure included a trip to a nearby gas station where he bought a packet of snack chips and a bottle of water. After he was arrested for his crimes, he (a full White American guy) surprisingly was calm enough not to resist arrest or flap his arms around like an idiot protester would. In return, the Charleston, South Carolina cops probably gave Roof a free Burger King meal in an attempt to get him more confortable to confess to his crimes. Difference between Elliot Rodger and Dylann Roof was that Elliot hated women men and maybe humanity, whereas Roof hated blacks. Guess who's worse: Elliot for making no effort to stop being a self-entitled wealthy son of his Hollywood film director father, who made no effort to talk to women or even try to improve his self-pity attitude in order to get laid, or Roof (whose family is not well off financially) trying to actually make a positive contribution to society only to be totally misguided into ridding his home country of the United States of America of all the black people because of the past history between them. Elliot's been deceased since 2014, whereas Roof is still alive and in prison. If Elliot was still alive, he would've been sent back to his birthplace home country of the United Kingdom (he was born there in July 24, 1991) whereas Roof is a fully naturalized American citizen by birth. But back to the question at hand, would Elliot have been given the same free Burger King meal privilege or would he flap his arms around and try to resist arrest unlike Roof?