I've been watching a ton of the original ECW on the Network as of late and in my opinion it's painfully obvious that the best all around wrestler in ECW history, again at least in my opinion is The Franchise Shane Douglas. Yet for whatever reason I've always felt he doesn't really get his just due from fans as being the true face of ECW. I must confess that I've always been a big fan of Douglas. But it just seems to me that when people talk ECW they talk Dreamer, Sandman, Taz, and maybe even Cactus Jack. If you look at his matches, who was better in ring wise? His stuff with The Triple Threat was way ahead of it's time. He and Bam Bam put on a classic at November to Remember 1997. He headlined ECW's biggest event 3 times. In my opinion he's one of the Top 10 guys to ever be given a microphone. He literally started on ECW (On screen) in 1993. in my opinion, he's the greatest champion in ECW history. Which is way him not not being involved in the ECW One Night Stand in 2005 is an absolute joke. Don't get me wrong, the PPV was great but without him something was certainly missing. So, why is it that he gets kinda lost in the shuffle when the majority think ECW? Is it because he left for WWE in 95 and due to the terrible Dean Douglas gimmick his run there was overall very underwhelming , or is it because he had a falling out with Heyman in 99, and left for WCW spending both company's final years in the Turner fold as a midcard heel? Nonetheless he did have some success in both WWE and WCW winning IC belt and the United States Championship. So, am I off base in think he's underrated overall, if so, why? Who was better in ECW? If you agree with me, why do you think that is? Let me know your thoughts!