So, we have had various wrestlers get injured which is unfortunate but is unpredictable as well. The thing I want to discuss about is what happens after an injury.
Let's look on some injuries which we can remember:
Something common in the above is that each match continued after the injury. Even more, in 2015 Cesaro was revealed to wrestle for a couple of months while having a injury. DJZ in TNA also did the same.
And there lies my question? Why?
Cesaro and DJZ were careless enough. And that's wrong. But the match could and should've stopped in case of Rollins, Sting and Balor.
I commend these three for completing the respective matches but wouldn't it be right to rather stop the match at the same time itself? Why take a risk of further worsening your injury? Likein case of Sting after getting hit with a second turnbuckle bomb.
Isn't the wrestler's well being more important than the result of the match?
Let's look on some injuries which we can remember:
- Seth Rollins in a live event against Kane.
- Finn Balor at Summerslam against Seth Rollins.
- Sting at Night Of Champions against Seth Rollins.
Something common in the above is that each match continued after the injury. Even more, in 2015 Cesaro was revealed to wrestle for a couple of months while having a injury. DJZ in TNA also did the same.
And there lies my question? Why?
Cesaro and DJZ were careless enough. And that's wrong. But the match could and should've stopped in case of Rollins, Sting and Balor.
I commend these three for completing the respective matches but wouldn't it be right to rather stop the match at the same time itself? Why take a risk of further worsening your injury? Likein case of Sting after getting hit with a second turnbuckle bomb.
Isn't the wrestler's well being more important than the result of the match?