From 1948 to 1955 wrestling was going through a transitional stage due to exposure from the newly invented television. Ratings were high, and it was literally a national sensation. After a while due to overexposure professional wrestling began to lose its ratings, sponsors, and quickly fell from the graces of the 3 major programming stations.
Then in the 1980's the "wrestling boom" happens and wrestlers such as Andre, Hogan, etc became huge starts; and wrestling had arguably the greatest era in it's prolific history. However, it was a very very different format from Monday Night Raw. We saw Saturday Night Main Event and Prime Time Wrestling take stage in what still have record rating when it comes to wrestling. (15.2 with 33 million viewers)
WrestleMania III had 93,000+ people in attendance, still the highest amount of people at a wrestling event, ever.
The numbers would like to say that Old School Wrestling is overwhelmingly better than New School Wrestling.
I often times see posters on this site referring to Hulk Hogan in terms of debate when it comes to John Cena, largely in the thread John Cena thread. They say he's the second version of Hulk Hogan, without the Charisma of Hulk Hogan.
However, this has led me to ask myself one question. If Hulk Hogan had to get his Eat your Vitamins speech every single week on episodic television; would he have been anywhere near the sensation he was?
If we were forced to see Ric Flair vs Steamboat each and every single week, how long before that became stale?
If the Old School product was produced today, would it still have garnered 15.2 on the ratings scales? Do the numbers lie to us suggesting that Hulk Hogan, Andre, Steamboat, Savage, etc based on ratings, attendance, etc were so much better than the likes of Cena, Orton, Triple H, etc?
I would also like to know personal opinions on overall quality of matches. Which were better? The New Generation's matches or the Old Generations matches? Based on psyche, charisma, flow of matches, etc; who had better matches, feuds, overall product, etc?
Then in the 1980's the "wrestling boom" happens and wrestlers such as Andre, Hogan, etc became huge starts; and wrestling had arguably the greatest era in it's prolific history. However, it was a very very different format from Monday Night Raw. We saw Saturday Night Main Event and Prime Time Wrestling take stage in what still have record rating when it comes to wrestling. (15.2 with 33 million viewers)
WrestleMania III had 93,000+ people in attendance, still the highest amount of people at a wrestling event, ever.
The numbers would like to say that Old School Wrestling is overwhelmingly better than New School Wrestling.
I often times see posters on this site referring to Hulk Hogan in terms of debate when it comes to John Cena, largely in the thread John Cena thread. They say he's the second version of Hulk Hogan, without the Charisma of Hulk Hogan.
However, this has led me to ask myself one question. If Hulk Hogan had to get his Eat your Vitamins speech every single week on episodic television; would he have been anywhere near the sensation he was?
If we were forced to see Ric Flair vs Steamboat each and every single week, how long before that became stale?
If the Old School product was produced today, would it still have garnered 15.2 on the ratings scales? Do the numbers lie to us suggesting that Hulk Hogan, Andre, Steamboat, Savage, etc based on ratings, attendance, etc were so much better than the likes of Cena, Orton, Triple H, etc?
I would also like to know personal opinions on overall quality of matches. Which were better? The New Generation's matches or the Old Generations matches? Based on psyche, charisma, flow of matches, etc; who had better matches, feuds, overall product, etc?