1)I was watching the Raw mainevent before NWO '01- Benoit/Angle vs Rock/Austin with HHH on the commentary, the other day. JR makes this remark that "it's going to be a classic, epic confrontation etc. " thus selling the HHH/Austin match at NWO. Obviously, it wasn't a classic, and wasn't supposed to be one. HBK-Taker is classic. Rock-Hogan was epic. HHH vs Austin was just MEH. Nonetheless. I wondered how HHH felt about being considered NOT WORTHY of the WM mainevent because Austin vs Rock was THE MATCH. And it got me thinking. 2)Does the WWE always go with the right mainevent? And by mainevent here, I purely mean the match for the WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP and not the match that ended a particular Wrestlemania. Were there wrestlers in the past who deserved to be in the world title match instead of the one who actually was? 3)So let me illuminate you- I will make a few arguments, raise a few questions. You can make your own arguments about particular Wrestlemanias and what you think should have been the mainevent match, and why. You can choose any WM after WM17. Naturally, between 2003-2013, there were two world titles defended on the show so you can go for either of the title. The emphasis is on WHOM you think should've been the challenger/champion and NOT on which match should've closed the show. 4)I am choosing two particular WM championship mainevent matches as my proposed argument. I'll give my reasons. You can either speak against my argument, or for them, in addition to making your own arguments about some other WM world title matches. A)The WHC championship match at WM22. Giving the WHC to Rey Mysterio was one of the dumbest things the WWE ever did, IMO. Not only did giving the WHC to a tiny cruiserweight tarnish the legacy of the iconic WHC, but the way they did it(using Eddie's death) was absolutely abominable. My argument is, if you wanted to push someone just on account of Eddie's death, why not choose Chavo instead? Good wrestler. 210 lbs, close to being a heavyweight at least. What about CHRIS BENOIT? Guy was the best wrestler they had on Smackdown that year besides Kurt Angle. He was close to Eddie as well. But instead, he's defending the US title?? (And this is only retrospective guys, so please don't tell me that Benoit would go on to do what he did in 2007. Neither us nor the WWE had any idea in 2006, so it shouldn't affect their booking of him). Please don't give me the "Rey sells merchandise" BS argument. If tomorrow, Santino Marella were to suddenly sell a lot of socks, and make the WWE some money, they won't put him the main event against Roman Reigns right? I wonder how Ric Flair, Kevin Nash, Sting, among others felt about them giving the WHC to Mysterio. So here's my argument for the WHC match at WM22:- Either Kurt Angle(C) vs The Undertaker. Or a combination of challengers including Chavo Guerrero, Randy Orton, or Chris Benoit. Jesus fucking Christ..it'd have been a classic had they gone with Angle vs Benoit. Fuck. Or even Angle vs Taker. Btw, the dumbfucks in the WWE would even go on to give the WHC to rey mysterio for a second time. What an abomination! Guys who actually deserved it at least ONCE between 2002-2010 never got it, including The Big Show, Kane, and Mark Henry. B. The WWE title mainevent of WM29. Where do I even begin? John Cena vs Fucking The Rock. For the title. A match which never needed a title, or Cena to win the Rumble. And moreover, they eliminate Punk out of the mainevent. No wonder Punk left. What an abomination! My argument:- WWE championship match should've been Punk defending against ANYONE,, or against Rock and Cena in a triple threat, if the latter even needed to be in a championship match. So guys, ATTACK! You can choose any world title match between WM 18 and WM 31..and provide reasons for your argument.