I was thinking about how often WWE seems to chicken out of making a tough decision on which two wrestlers should face each other by throwing their hands up and just making it a Triple Threat or Fatal Four-Way match. "This guy or this guy? Oh hell, throw them all in there!" I was thinking of examples when I had another thought... So often, Raw will start with--or at least include--a standoff in the ring. Using these names just as an example (not factual), it would go something like this... - Roman Reigns is champion and is cutting an in-ring promo to open Raw. - Kevin Owens will come out saying he wants a shot at the title. - Chris Jericho will come out and say he is friends with KO, but he too wants a shot at the title. - Seth Rollins comes out saying he likes Roman but he also wants a shot at the title. - Steph or Foley come out and say something like "You all want a match??" Then it will be Kevin Owens..(applause) and Chris Jericho.. (decent applause) vs. Roman Reigns (slightly more applause)...and SETH ROLLINS! (Huge pop) My question is...why does every live crowd pop huge for the last, exaggerated name...when he is always the fourth guy in the ring and there should be no surprise where this is going? But, again, this seems to be a case of lazy booking. 4 guys all want the same thing? Throw 'em all in the ring and we'll worry about it next week. That's how it seems to me anyway. I have seen some fine multi-competitor matches before, so I agree they have their place. But so often? Feels lazy--what do you guys think?