Anyone arguing for Vince McMahon clearly isn't paying attention to what KB said: WHO IS THE BETTER WRESTLER. Vince McMahon has never won at WrestleMania. Taker has never lost. Vince McMahon has won one WWE Title, and one Royal Rumble. Taker has won the WWE title four times, the WHC three times, and a Royal Rumble victory. Vince McMahon is most famous for owning the WWE and getting his ass kicked by his own wrestlers. Taker is famous for owning his opponents, and getting his ass kicked by nobody. In a wrestling match, there's no way Vince McMahon walks out of this match. The referee may as well not even be in the match, because Taker is going to be dead set on ending Vince McMahon. And this whole "Vince owns the company" argument is moot, because this is in the WCW region. If anything, Vince is at a disadvantage because of his relationship with WCW.