I fell that since the brand split, they product as been diluted even more then it was before. With a ppv every months for both brand, the b-shows fell less and less special. Personally, I would love to see the schedule go back to one ppv a months, this way you et more time to build interesting feud for brand only ppv and they would fell more special and less rush After saying that, here how I would do the ppv schedule for 2018 January: royal rumble (both brand) February: fast lane ( raw) March : elimination chamber (smackdown) April : wrestlemania (both brand) May : extreme rules (raw) June : money in the bank (smackdown) July: king of the ring (raw) August: summerslam (both brand) September: backlash (smackdown) October: hell in a cell (raw) November: survivor series (both brand) December: payback (smackdown) I know this schedule would never happen but this would help wwe have a better product in the end. I eliminate tlc, clash of champions and battleground from the schedule simply because I don't see the point of these shows as this points. Also I put king of the ring back on the schedule mostly because you need a equivalent to money in the bank for the raw brand and I think having the winner of the tournament get a title shot at summerslam or something like that makes for a good equivalent to money in the bank. So do you agree with me that you should have a reduce ppv schedule or do you like having a ppv every 2 weeks?