So because Danielson hasn't won anything in one of the big companies, he's not as good as someone who's world title reigns are very underwhelming? Well, if we operate under that logic, why is Danielson even in this tournament? Hell, ECW wasn't really one of the big companies when you think about it, so take Raven out of it too. Rhino too. And Rick Martel, since AWA was always behind WWE and NWA. Nick Bockwinkel should go while we're at it. And let's not forget Verne Gagne. In fact, let's get rid of anyone outside of America. What have they done in one of the "big companies" anyway? See the stupidity there? Saying that Danielson would lose to DDP because he hasn't done anything in WWE yet, even though he's been on their programs for all of two months, is a really weak argument. He made ROH notable. If it wasn't for him, no one would be talking about ROH as much as they are, and it would just be another indy fed. And it seems as though because he's done a lot of his work in a "indy fed", that it doesn't mean anything or that it doesn't measure up. Hence, people brush him off as an IWC darling who's overrated. Watch any match Danielson is involved in. If you can seriously call him overrated, you're either lying, don't know what you're talking about, or have zero taste. This is someone who's earned his reputation as one of the best today and possibly in history, which is more than a lot of today's wrestlers can say. To write him off just because he hasn't done anything in WWE yet is an insult to him and his work.