How am I wrong? I've gven you my opinion and it's just that. MY OPINION. The Arquette thing is always going to be brought up as a cheap shot that I give you. Because I think he's (DDP) overrated (I spelt it 'ovveratted' once) doesn't mean that I don't think he deserves a world title I just feel that the way he is remembered isn't the way he should be remembered. Christopher Daniels is in the tournament, is he part of this 'great' circle of wrestlers? I'm entitled to my opinion and just because I don't think he's great doesn't make it so. I could think ben & jerry's is a better ice Cream than Hagen Daz but that doesn't make it so. It's MY OPINION. I took Danielson because I felt he has the better in ring ability and that edges him ahead. I'll give you another person who should have won a world title but never did: Ted DiBiase. Just because he won the title doesn't mean he's not a quality in-ring performer. He's better than Danielson & DDP in my book. You have yet to prove that DDP isn't repetitive I think he is. I clearly should look Websters up more often because you are clearly correct. Well done. Tenta, face it, I'm not going to quit and neither are you. It's one or the other and people will vote for whoever. This debate probably won't change anything.