Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in '2013 Wrestling Awards' started by klunderbunker, Dec 9, 2013.
Rhodes family vs The Authority
Rhodes (Adams) Family vs Authority was pretty great.
Bryan vs Trips was what made him, IMHO.
If all else fails, there's always Matt Hardy vs Diabetes
As much as I like the Wyatts, Shield, Punks, Bryan and so on, I must admit none o them has had a really good feud. The Rhodes authority debacle was fairly short, but pure quality the whole way through.
Cody Rhodes and Goldust vs. The Authority, CM Punk vs. Paul Heyman, Team Hell No vs. The Shield, and CM Punk vs. The Undertaker are really the only feuds worth nominating
Bryan vs Authority.
I have to go with Bryan vs. The Authority. I think Punk vs. Heyman had potential, but WWE dragged it out too long and, in hindsight, neither Ryback or Axel were guys who should've been paired with him. Bryan vs. The Authority might not have had the ending, or temporary ending at least, most people may have wanted, but it was an interesting feud that kept people endlessly talking and asking questions about. For instance, questions like "could it be Bryan vs. Triple H at WM for the title?", "Cena vs. Bryan II at WM XXX?", etc.
Rhodes Family vs. The Authority had everything including a properly executed ending. Strange that WWE didn't drop the ball with it.
Not a lot in this category beyond short month long feuds or a series of matches rather than an actual feud.
Rhodes Dynasty vs Shield
Punk vs the Heyman Family
Heyman and Punk