I'm sure this doesn't make much difference, but here goes:
John Cena has been compared to Hulk Hogan numerous times. They have similar characters. Both All-American. Both appeal to children. Both good guys who do the right thing, and stand up for what's right. Both incredibly dominant over the WWE for extreme lengths of time.
However, Cena has probably been 'Hogan-lite'. He's invaded pop culture, but not to the level that Hogan did. He's been dominant, but not as dominant as Hogan was.
Fair estimation of Cena, no?
Well then, you have to keep one thing in mind when making your decision here. Before Hogan became Hogan. Before Hulkamania really ran wild, he first had to get away from one man. The one man that he couldn't defeat. The one man that outsmarted him every step of the way.
That man was Nick Bockwinkel.
Here's how it would go.
Cena would be dominant. He'd have Bockwinkel on the defensive for most of the match. But the entire time that Cena was asserting his will over Bock, Bock would in turn be frustrating Cena with his defense. With the cheap shots every time that Heenan got the referee's back turned for even a second. He'd be wearing him down, and taking him off of his game plan.
Late in the match, Bock would position himself in a way that when Cena went to hit him, he'd move and Cena would take out the referee. Cena would then get Bock up for the "Attitude Adjustment", as a second referee came into the ring. One-two-three seconds later, and Cena would win... or so it would seem.
The first referee would come to and overrule the decision, disqualifying Cena for hitting an official. Protests would be made. Fans would be in an uproar. And Nick Bockwinkel would roll out of the ring, and raise his arm in victory as he made his way to the back.
Because that's how the man they called "Tricky Nicky" did it.
If he could do it time and again against Hogan... he'd be able to do it to Hogan-lite too.