You can't be serious...
Kane gets the "Kane is Kane" arguments, because he's still relevant enough that everyone knows his past championships and accomplishments. People know all about how amazing the Big Red Machine was when he broke onto the scene.
What accomplishments does Dean Ambrose have, that compare to that of Kane's? How many world championships? How any tag titles?
The point GSB was trying to get across wasn't that he was confused about how awesome Kane was; it was that the arguments for Kane (from A Certain Poster who has been
mighty critical of some of the rationale other people have used to cast their votes) consist of saying "COMMON SENSE!" and stamping a foot. They're arguments which are great for convincing people who already agree with you, and perhaps people have gotten their idea of what a discussion/debate is from watching the presidential election this year. As far as convincing people who are on the fence with their votes, it's not such a reliable tactic.
I'll imagine some gif right now which communicates the idea that I should go fuck myself, spare you the feeble effort and the board the bandwidth.
As for myself, I personally haven't decided. We're talking about peak career here, and Kane did have fairly iconic wrestling gear; his mask might have meant more to his character than any other WWE performer, Rey Mysterio included. At first glance it would seem easy to dismiss Dean Ambrose; after all, he's just wearing jeans and a wifebeater. However, the casual look of Dean Ambrose's ring attire, which gives the
impression of sloppiness, is a calculated decision. "Unhinged" characters aren't quite as believable when they're going out suited up in well-coordinated Lycra. So while I'm leaning Kane for this- that one-armed bodysuit really was a great costuming design- I'm going to hold my vote for now, because voting for Dean Ambrose might piss off more people than voting for Kane.