WWE & TNA Forum
Wrestling News
Loading...


Go Back   WrestleZone Forums > Wrestling - Non Spam Sections > World Wrestling Entertainment
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Arcade vBookie

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-14-2017, 02:54 AM
RomanfreakinReigns's Avatar
RomanfreakinReigns RomanfreakinReigns is offline
Registered User
Knockout Champion
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 736
RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...
Default Is having one Supreme world title better than two different titles?

This nostalgia just seemed to pop up in my mind of the period when Roman Reigns was the WWE WHC, and it was an interesting reign with the two matches he had with Styles, and the one with Rollins, only for them to make the wrong choice(IMHO) by giving Ambrose both the MITB and the title at the eponymous event, eventually leading into the brand/roster split and two separate championships and their distinct histories. (Perhaps Reigns' suspension for having violated the Wellness Policy does factor in, for these decisions).

At any rate, I wondered what could have been, had the Reign of Reigns continued as a Solo, Supreme champion; who would have won the WWE WHC by now, and who wouldn't ?(Between the two titles and their champions we have seen so far)

What view regarding the World Title should we subscribe to, and what factors go into our belief?

Let us first note that so far, the champions for both titles have been:-
WWE:- Reigns drops to Rollins, Ambrose cashes in and SDL list of champions are Ambrose, AJ Styles, Cena, Bray Wyatt, Randy Orton, and Jinder Mahal.

Universal-Finn Balor, Kevin Owens, Goldberg, Brock Lesnar.

I would like to make the argument that with the exception of AJ Styles- NONE of the title wins or reigns were of note or vigour, and could have well been avoided, or as is the case with Lesnar, are sort of contentious in that on the one hand, Lesnar as your champion is as legit and prestigious as it gets, and yet his remaining absent, according to some, detracts from fan interest in the product.

Ambrose's reign sucked, and it can be argued that his association with the talented Rollins and Reigns, and the latter's suspension for violating the wellness policy, are reasons why he won the MITB/WWE WHC in the first place.

Finn Balor had barely debuted, and got injured.

Kevin Owens' win although quite a pleasant event, his reign was sort of disappointing.

Goldberg and Lesnar could easily have had their prolonged feud for "the battle for supremacy or dominance" without having to have a main title be exchanged in the process.

Bray Wyatt IMO, wasn't ready, and wouldn't be champion had it not been for the roster split into two.

Randy Orton should've stayed away from the title, and John Cena's historic 16th title win, would've been far more potent and momentous had it occurred in a better set of conditions, resulting in better feuds, rather than what happened, with him dropping it to Wyatt(who dropped it to Orton). In fact, they managed to ruin the one thing which lent SDL immense vitality- AJ Styles persona, his presence, promos, and reign as WWE champion.

And finally, there's the curious case of Jinder Mahal. What can we even say about him, stemming from no malice or hatred but just a simple fact, it's sort of laughable when one considers the contrast between "AJ Styles, the WWE champion" and Jinder Mahal as champion. There's literally no scintillation or excitement about SDL and Jinder as champion, IMO.

It's easy to infer that with one main championship, you don't pass titles around or have them dropped just for the sake of it, or hand them to Jinder Mahal. The cream always rises to the top.

Proponents of the Roster Split or two championships usually say that they are necessary, what else would people feud for, and deserving candidates wouldn't even get to touch the title if only one major world championship existed.

Even I somewhat feel it, but when you look at the evidence of what has transpired, how, despite two titles, the Reign of AJ Styles can be disrupted only to be followed by the most uninspiring and lackluster reigns in the form of Wyatt, Orton and Jinder, and on the Raw side, an absent Lesnar, is having one Supreme title not more desirable?

A title so sacrosanct that only Reigns, AJ Styles etc. get to carry it, and when John Cena wins it for the 16th time, it matters, or when Kevin Owens is crowned champion for the first time, it matters, and even if Brock Lesnar wins it, you have scintillating feuds and contenders, and Randy Orton(for pity's sake), Jinder Mahal don't get close to it.

For those of you who would say "We have so many people, what would they feud for if there's only one world chamionship", this simple argument may help put things into perspective for you guys:-

It's fine that on Raw, the super heavyweights and stars are contending for the world title.
But how on earth do you think Baron Corbin is ready, Jinder Mahal could be believable as anything MORE than a US champion(if even believable as THAT), Randy Orton deserved to be in the title picture again, for the 25th time in his career, or Shinsuke Nakamura is ready?

So if you exclude all of those SDL contenders, really only AJ Styles is a world championship material, as well as John Cena, and to a lesser extent than Styles, Kevin Owens.

These three can easily be mingled into Raw's picture, or rotated.
To end, I would like to state that:-

In a state where there's only one Supreme championship and champion, feuds are properly placed, deserving candidates win or contend for the title, the cream rises to the top, you don't hurry people into becoming world champion, and there's usually a consistency and constant excitement of the hunt.

In a state with two champions, things are diluted, a lot of experimentation occurs, undeserving or not-yet-ready candidates win the MITB and/or championship, and at times the title fluctuates between functioning as a World title to functioning as a midcard or less glorious title, as is happening currently, with Mahal's reign as WWE champion and the AJ Styles-KO feud
for the US title.


Your thoughts?

Last edited by RomanfreakinReigns : 08-14-2017 at 03:11 AM.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-14-2017, 03:02 AM
ShinChan's Avatar
ShinChan ShinChan is offline
Who Am I?
ECW TV Champion
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: India
Posts: 2,316
ShinChan is getting some looks on Smackdown...ShinChan is getting some looks on Smackdown...ShinChan is getting some looks on Smackdown...ShinChan is getting some looks on Smackdown...ShinChan is getting some looks on Smackdown...ShinChan is getting some looks on Smackdown...ShinChan is getting some looks on Smackdown...ShinChan is getting some looks on Smackdown...ShinChan is getting some looks on Smackdown...ShinChan is getting some looks on Smackdown...ShinChan is getting some looks on Smackdown...
Default

But Brand Split? Brand split means two different brands and each brand needs a top champion. It only needed some strong booking to make these two top Champions feel like Champions. Jinder Mahal isn't going to make it feel like the top Championship. So, it kind of depends on the booking of the champion. Getting Dolph Ziggler as a challenger for your title at Summerslam isn't going to do any favours when there is a much bigger match in AJ Styles Vs. John Cena II.

Also, a side note : Bray Wyatt was ready to be a World Champion.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-14-2017, 04:05 AM
The Perfect Max's Avatar
The Perfect Max The Perfect Max is offline
I Am Jericho
WWE Diva's Champion
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 591
The Perfect Max worked a dark match on ECW recently...The Perfect Max worked a dark match on ECW recently...The Perfect Max worked a dark match on ECW recently...The Perfect Max worked a dark match on ECW recently...The Perfect Max worked a dark match on ECW recently...The Perfect Max worked a dark match on ECW recently...The Perfect Max worked a dark match on ECW recently...The Perfect Max worked a dark match on ECW recently...The Perfect Max worked a dark match on ECW recently...The Perfect Max worked a dark match on ECW recently...The Perfect Max worked a dark match on ECW recently...
Default

As someone who believes that with a brand split, there should be separate world, women's, tag team etc. titles, I struggle to understand why one world title would make any logical sense. But in the realistic world in which you describe since the brand split, you are 100% right. We have had some really bizzare switches, and I can guarantee that Jinder Mahal would never be the undisputed World Heavyweight Champion. I rejoiced when they merged the titles in late 2013 because the reality is that only one world title was needed where there was no roster split. I'd say that based on the way that WWE has attempted to book it's world champions, maybe they can't cope with two right now.

But, I think if WWE was to revert back to one world title, the brand split would be cheapend even more than it already has been. Whether it is necessary at this point, I'm not sure. But if WWE perhaps actually thought about what they were doing when they have these shakeups or drafts, then it wouldn't necessarily be a problem and already ready world title contenders would be present on the show. After all, during the first brand split, I didn't see it as a problem. On Raw, even though Triple H dominated the World Heavyweight Championship, there always seemed to be multiple contenders and alternative champions. Now SmackDown at times was somewhat of a different story, and when Brock Lesnar vs. Hardcore Holly is your WWE Championship match, you suddenly realise the downside to a split. But most of the time it worked, so I do believe that WWE could make it work again. But instead they rush new and unready guys to the title, and so it cheapens the value of the title. SmackDown is the prime example. We have AJ Styles vs. Kevin Owens and Jinder Mahal vs. Shinsuke Nakamura. I think anybody could understand an irregular fan confusing which title went to which feud.

I think if WWE had retained just the one world champion, and unless it was AJ Styles or maybe Kevin Owens, they would undoubtedly be someone on Raw right now. Braun Strowman and Roman Reigns come to mind immediately. Though I'm glad they are holding off Strowman a little bit longer. Perhaps Samoa Joe could be in that conversation sooner rather than later. Then of course you have Seth Rollins. And then the free agent John Cena. Ultimately though, I think the landscape of WWE would be very different.

Last edited by The Perfect Max : 08-14-2017 at 04:10 AM.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-14-2017, 09:23 AM
HORRORHOLIC HORRORHOLIC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 193
HORRORHOLIC is looking to come up from OCW...HORRORHOLIC is looking to come up from OCW...HORRORHOLIC is looking to come up from OCW...
Default

Having two world champions sucks!! I've always thought it was ridiculous. There should be one championship that everyone in the company has as their ultimate goal. Having two champions make it seem less important

Now as far as the other titles. I'm not the biggest fan of the brand spit to begin with because it limits the matches we see. But if they have to do a brand split they should keep all the woman on one show and all the tag teams on the other, because by having them separated it REALLY limits the variety of matches for them.

Last edited by HORRORHOLIC : 08-14-2017 at 09:26 AM.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-14-2017, 09:47 AM
Jack-Hammer's Avatar
Jack-Hammer Jack-Hammer is offline
The Once And Future Lizard King!!!!
Wrestlezone Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Kentucky
Age: 37
Posts: 12,613
Jack-Hammer is an Intercontinental Champion...Jack-Hammer is an Intercontinental Champion...Jack-Hammer is an Intercontinental Champion...Jack-Hammer is an Intercontinental Champion...Jack-Hammer is an Intercontinental Champion...Jack-Hammer is an Intercontinental Champion...Jack-Hammer is an Intercontinental Champion...Jack-Hammer is an Intercontinental Champion...Jack-Hammer is an Intercontinental Champion...Jack-Hammer is an Intercontinental Champion...Jack-Hammer is an Intercontinental Champion...
Default

If you're looking at it from a purely ideological perspective, then having one, singular undisputed top championship is superior but you also have to look at how things are in reality. If you're going to have two different brands with its own wrestlers being used exclusively for that brand, then each brand is going to have to have its own top championship otherwise you already send a message that one brand doesn't mean as much from the very start.

One thing that helps this brand split is that the WWE Championship, the original World Championship created in 1963, is currently on SmackDown. Instead of creating a new championship for what was always seen as the B show, and still is to a healthy degree, you have THE top title defended there and that means there's almost no chance that Vince will purposely do something to lessen its value. We may sometimes disagree with some decisions he makes, including who is WWE Champion at times, but Vince has never genuinely tried to do anything to hurt it. In contrast, the World Heavyweight Championship, at least for the final few years of its existence, was booked as and clearly viewed as inferior to the WWE Championship; if anything, the last years it was around, the online community viewed the WHC as the unofficial upper mid-card championship as genuinely seemed to occupy the spot formerly held by the Intercontinental Championship.

The thing about WWE is that it's damned if it does and damned if it doesn't. If you went back to a single World Championship, then you have complaints just as you will if you kept two of them. When JBL said that online fans would complain if they won the lottery, he was right.
__________________
"What Do I Know Of Cultured Ways, The Gilt, The Craft And The Lie?
I, Who Was Born In A Naked Land And Bred In The Open Sky.
The Subtle Tongue, The Sophist Guile, They Fail When The Broadswords Sing.
Rush In And Die Dogs - I Was A Man Before I Was King."


Conan Of Cimmeria
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-14-2017, 12:19 PM
Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D.'s Avatar
Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. is online now
Kamehamehaaaaa!!
Million Dollar Champion
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece
Age: 22
Posts: 1,260
Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...
Default

Given the fact that we got Jinder Mahal as a champ, Ziggler challenging for a world title, Lesnar doing part-time work, Nakamura and Corbin are maybe the next champions after 5 months on the main roster, Balor became "world" champ after 1 month on the main roster and you have a roster where the only true draws and only true superstars are Lesnar, HHH, Cena and Undertaker and to a lesse extend Roman and Orton and everyone else is just getting there, then yeah, two world titles suck.

I always supported the notion "one company=one world title". You want brand titles? Then fucking make the IC championship and the US Championship into brand titles! They could end up getting more exposure and mean more rather than be viewed as toys and have the same guys feuding over them for 7 months straight.

In the original brand split, they had Austin, Rock, Undertaker, HHH, Hogan, Flair, Nash, Jericho, Angle, Rey Mysterio, Edge, Kane, RVD, Benoit, Guerrero, Big Show. And those guys were viewed as big fucking deals back then. 16 wrestlers you could name world champions and noone would question the decision. 16 wrestlers that could carry a show! That's insane! All bonafied names not only in the wrestling biz but also on the mainstream community. Of course you can create seperate shows!

This brand split should have been different. It should have been used to elevate the midcard championships and seperate the elite. But we're in the "everyone deserves it" era. The midcard era.

Let's review our champions:
Balor, never even realised he was a world champion.
Owens? One feel good moment and then 5 months of boredom. It would feel the same had he not won the belt, which means that his reign didn't really do anything for his name.
Goldberg and Lesnar? Part-timers that didn't really need the belt and just threw RAW out of balance.
Ambrose? Had potential but got lost.
Styles? Maybe they only reign that mattered, but he only feuded with Ambrose during it and somewhat Cena to whom he lost the belt.
Cena? Became champ just for the numbers. Wyatt? Transitional. Orton? Let's not talk about that. Jinder? Give me a break.
Nakamura and Corbin? Midcarders.

Let's face it. Lesnar could still do the thing with Goldberg and have matches with Joe and Strowman without the title. The whole feud between Chris and Owens ended up being for the US title instead. Jinder would have made a fine US champ or IC champ. Wyatt and Orton turns out never really needed the belt. Only Styles benefited from it and only Styles elevated the title.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-14-2017, 01:21 PM
d_henderson1810 d_henderson1810 is offline
Registered User
WCW TV Champion
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,618
d_henderson1810 worked a dark match on ECW recently...d_henderson1810 worked a dark match on ECW recently...d_henderson1810 worked a dark match on ECW recently...d_henderson1810 worked a dark match on ECW recently...d_henderson1810 worked a dark match on ECW recently...d_henderson1810 worked a dark match on ECW recently...d_henderson1810 worked a dark match on ECW recently...d_henderson1810 worked a dark match on ECW recently...d_henderson1810 worked a dark match on ECW recently...
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RomanfreakinReigns View Post
This nostalgia just seemed to pop up in my mind of the period when Roman Reigns was the WWE WHC, and it was an interesting reign with the two matches he had with Styles, and the one with Rollins, only for them to make the wrong choice(IMHO) by giving Ambrose both the MITB and the title at the eponymous event, eventually leading into the brand/roster split and two separate championships and their distinct histories. (Perhaps Reigns' suspension for having violated the Wellness Policy does factor in, for these decisions).

At any rate, I wondered what could have been, had the Reign of Reigns continued as a Solo, Supreme champion; who would have won the WWE WHC by now, and who wouldn't ?(Between the two titles and their champions we have seen so far)

What view regarding the World Title should we subscribe to, and what factors go into our belief?

Let us first note that so far, the champions for both titles have been:-
WWE:- Reigns drops to Rollins, Ambrose cashes in and SDL list of champions are Ambrose, AJ Styles, Cena, Bray Wyatt, Randy Orton, and Jinder Mahal.

Universal-Finn Balor, Kevin Owens, Goldberg, Brock Lesnar.

I would like to make the argument that with the exception of AJ Styles- NONE of the title wins or reigns were of note or vigour, and could have well been avoided, or as is the case with Lesnar, are sort of contentious in that on the one hand, Lesnar as your champion is as legit and prestigious as it gets, and yet his remaining absent, according to some, detracts from fan interest in the product.

Ambrose's reign sucked, and it can be argued that his association with the talented Rollins and Reigns, and the latter's suspension for violating the wellness policy, are reasons why he won the MITB/WWE WHC in the first place.

Finn Balor had barely debuted, and got injured.

Kevin Owens' win although quite a pleasant event, his reign was sort of disappointing.

Goldberg and Lesnar could easily have had their prolonged feud for "the battle for supremacy or dominance" without having to have a main title be exchanged in the process.

Bray Wyatt IMO, wasn't ready, and wouldn't be champion had it not been for the roster split into two.

Randy Orton should've stayed away from the title, and John Cena's historic 16th title win, would've been far more potent and momentous had it occurred in a better set of conditions, resulting in better feuds, rather than what happened, with him dropping it to Wyatt(who dropped it to Orton). In fact, they managed to ruin the one thing which lent SDL immense vitality- AJ Styles persona, his presence, promos, and reign as WWE champion.

And finally, there's the curious case of Jinder Mahal. What can we even say about him, stemming from no malice or hatred but just a simple fact, it's sort of laughable when one considers the contrast between "AJ Styles, the WWE champion" and Jinder Mahal as champion. There's literally no scintillation or excitement about SDL and Jinder as champion, IMO.

It's easy to infer that with one main championship, you don't pass titles around or have them dropped just for the sake of it, or hand them to Jinder Mahal. The cream always rises to the top.

Proponents of the Roster Split or two championships usually say that they are necessary, what else would people feud for, and deserving candidates wouldn't even get to touch the title if only one major world championship existed.

Even I somewhat feel it, but when you look at the evidence of what has transpired, how, despite two titles, the Reign of AJ Styles can be disrupted only to be followed by the most uninspiring and lackluster reigns in the form of Wyatt, Orton and Jinder, and on the Raw side, an absent Lesnar, is having one Supreme title not more desirable?

A title so sacrosanct that only Reigns, AJ Styles etc. get to carry it, and when John Cena wins it for the 16th time, it matters, or when Kevin Owens is crowned champion for the first time, it matters, and even if Brock Lesnar wins it, you have scintillating feuds and contenders, and Randy Orton(for pity's sake), Jinder Mahal don't get close to it.

For those of you who would say "We have so many people, what would they feud for if there's only one world chamionship", this simple argument may help put things into perspective for you guys:-

It's fine that on Raw, the super heavyweights and stars are contending for the world title.
But how on earth do you think Baron Corbin is ready, Jinder Mahal could be believable as anything MORE than a US champion(if even believable as THAT), Randy Orton deserved to be in the title picture again, for the 25th time in his career, or Shinsuke Nakamura is ready?

So if you exclude all of those SDL contenders, really only AJ Styles is a world championship material, as well as John Cena, and to a lesser extent than Styles, Kevin Owens.

These three can easily be mingled into Raw's picture, or rotated.
To end, I would like to state that:-

In a state where there's only one Supreme championship and champion, feuds are properly placed, deserving candidates win or contend for the title, the cream rises to the top, you don't hurry people into becoming world champion, and there's usually a consistency and constant excitement of the hunt.

In a state with two champions, things are diluted, a lot of experimentation occurs, undeserving or not-yet-ready candidates win the MITB and/or championship, and at times the title fluctuates between functioning as a World title to functioning as a midcard or less glorious title, as is happening currently, with Mahal's reign as WWE champion and the AJ Styles-KO feud
for the US title.


Your thoughts?
I'm not looking forward to the future either, with the possibility that "Shitstain" Nakamura (who, once he has removed his enormous mouthguard out of his yap, still can't be understood due to a combination of accent and lisping. But hey, he has a cool opera entrance), or Baron "Borin"" (Look, I have tatts and wear a mean leather jacket, so I am a badass, despite lacking personality and only being pushed for being really tall).

I would want one title. I said in another post, never being the main champion is not meaning that your career is a failure. "Million-Dollar Man", Jake Roberts, Ricky Steamboat, Roddy Piper, Greg Valentine, Rick Rude and Mr Perfect are beloved Legends and worthy HoFers, yet none of them won the main belt. Does that detract from the greatness of their careers?

The champion is the one in my mind, is "The Man", the face that the company is built around. The guy who main events WM, and is either champion or chasing the belt. Styles is that guy, Cena is, Orton is, Seth was, (I didn't mind Ambrose's run, at least he is a better in-ring competitor than Reigns), Owens could be that guy.

However, Brock can't be, because he isn't around enough. The anorexic Finn Balor or "Shitstain" Nakamura definitely aren't. Neither is "Borin" Corbin (hell, Corbin Bernsen would be a more credible champion, and he isn't even a wrestler).

Mahal is just an attempt for Vince to tap into the 1 billion population Indian market. How else do you explain a jobber who lost a pre-WM Battle Royal by being eliminated by an NFL player who wasn't even in the match a month earlier?( Here's an idea. Have Jinder win the Andre Royal, and make it mean something, like the winner gets a No. 1 contendership).
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-14-2017, 02:38 PM
RomanfreakinReigns's Avatar
RomanfreakinReigns RomanfreakinReigns is offline
Registered User
Knockout Champion
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 736
RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. View Post
You have a roster where the only true draws and only true superstars are Lesnar, HHH, Cena and Undertaker and to a lesser extent Roman and Orton and everyone else is just getting there, then yeah, two world titles suck.
You can't really consider Undertaker and HHH as draws any more, since HHH is virtually absent, and Undertaker practically retired.

So yeah, we're only left with Brock and Cena at the top, and Cena's little brother Orton, if you can even consider him that much of a draw or a star at this point. I'd say Roman Reigns is getting there, followed by Seth Rollins and Joe. Actually, I'd say Reigns and AJ Styles are Vince's best bet after Lesnar and Cena, at this point, and Orton's on the lower rung of the ladder.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. View Post
I always supported the notion "one company=one world title". You want brand titles? Then fucking make the IC championship and the US Championship into brand titles! They could end up getting more exposure and mean more rather than be viewed as toys and have the same guys feuding over them for 7 months straight.
Totally. Right now, even the way the US and IC titles are booked isn't exactly invigorating, when you consider Styles who should clearly be world champion and/or engaged in scintillating feuds, intrigues, a faction like Club, but is practically being treated like Chris Jericho was, for YEARS. Just a mid-card workhorse.

Meanwhile, the IC title has seen no contenders or fresh feuds in over a year except for Ziggler, followed by Miz and Ambrose. That's three fucking people, for your IC title.

In an ideal world, Baron Corbin and Shinsuke Nakamura(even Finn Balor) would be feuding over, and having ladder matches for the IC title.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. View Post
In the original brand split, they had Austin, Rock, Undertaker, HHH, Hogan, Flair, Nash, Jericho, Angle, Rey Mysterio, Edge, Kane, RVD, Benoit, Guerrero, Big Show. And those guys were viewed as big fucking deals back then. 16 wrestlers you could name world champions and noone would question the decision. 16 wrestlers that could carry a show! That's insane! All bonafied names not only in the wrestling biz but also on the mainstream community. Of course you can create seperate shows!
Granted, all 16 of them are bona fide stars, you've sort of included a few wrong ones, but they still had others and so it does make them 16.

For instance, Kevin Nash was pretty much obsolete at that point and not a very good performer, Rey had barely debuted and had a legacy only as a cruiserweight, Flair was like 56 yrs old, Austin and Rock were going/gone, and Hogan, well, too old.

They still had Lesnar, Angle, Taker, Edge, Benoit, and Big Show on Smackdown, which is HUGE, and HHH, Shawn Michaels, Kane, Rob Van Dam, Chris Jericho, Booker T(and I could go on) over on Raw. Any one of them could have been champion, and that's not including Goldberg and many others, or Cena, Batista and Orton from OVW.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. View Post
This brand split should have been different. It should have been used to elevate the midcard championships and seperate the elite. But we're in the "everyone deserves it" era. The midcard era.
Absolutely! Can't agree more.

Balor in the first place is just too tiny, and had just debuted and they rushed to make him champion over Seth or Roman (for fuck's sake!), and now Shinsuke Nakamura is being rushed, and Baron "boring" Corbin doesn't even have the potential of a Sheamus on the mic or in the ring, and owing to his MITB win, he's already all but destined to be the WWE champion. Jesus.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. View Post
Let's face it. Lesnar could still do the thing with Goldberg and have matches with Joe and Strowman without the title. The whole feud between Chris and Owens ended up being for the US title instead. Jinder would have made a fine US champ or IC champ. Wyatt and Orton turns out never really needed the belt. Only Styles benefited from it and only Styles elevated the title.
This, I firmly believe in.

Styles was so huge and red hot last year, with his feud with Cena , a full-fledged heel, so cocky and amusing, the best performer in the whole world. And they couldn't even sustain that.

It's not Styles' fault he's booked the way he is, but couldn't they see he would be selling a lot more merchandise as the cocky heel champion still, especially united with the Club or something?

But instead he's got to feud for the US title with Kevin Owens, for 6 months while Jinder, Baron Corbin and Shinsuke Nakamura battle for the WWE championship! Absolutely ridiculous.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-14-2017, 02:58 PM
RomanfreakinReigns's Avatar
RomanfreakinReigns RomanfreakinReigns is offline
Registered User
Knockout Champion
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 736
RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by d_henderson1810 View Post
I'm not looking forward to the future either, with the possibility that "Shitstain" Nakamura (who, once he has removed his enormous mouthguard out of his yap, still can't be understood due to a combination of accent and lisping. But hey, he has a cool opera entrance), or Baron "Borin"" (Look, I have tatts and wear a mean leather jacket, so I am a badass, despite lacking personality and only being pushed for being really tall).
@enormous mouthguard.

I don't get the push or appeal for either Corbin or Big Cass on Raw. They're so bland, generic, fresh off the boat, not very convincing on the Mic, and what not.

I used to feel Sheamus was just a midcarder, albeit decent grappler, but I've seen him deliver this ferocious expression as a tough Irishman, which can be seen often, such as with Seth Rollins in the recent backstage segment, and he does have that aspect of a Spartan or Viking. Plus fantastic in the ring.
But these two don't have any of that, and you're right, they're being overpushed for being tall.

Quote:
Originally Posted by d_henderson1810 View Post
The champion is the one in my mind, is "The Man", the face that the company is built around. The guy who main events WM, and is either champion or chasing the belt. Styles is that guy, Cena is, Orton is, Seth was, (I didn't mind Ambrose's run, at least he is a better in-ring competitor than Reigns), Owens could be that guy.
I agree, Seth used to be that guy, now Joe and Seth are kind of at the same level and getting there, Ambrose is just Ambrose, and Roman Reigns and AJ Styles, IMO, should be champions in their respective brands, period. Untouchable champions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by d_henderson1810 View Post
However, Brock can't be, because he isn't around enough. The anorexic Finn Balor or "Shitstain" Nakamura definitely aren't. Neither is "Borin" Corbin (hell, Corbin Bernsen would be a more credible champion, and he isn't even a wrestler).
Finn Balor is just too small for me to take him seriously as a World champion EVER, no matter how many kicks he does, especially considering he's even more yawn-inducing on the mic than Jack Swagger or Mark Henry (interestingly, the French have the adjective petit for "small" and in English we usually use the word "petite" to describe certain really small, tiny little women, whom I don't really like. Weird you could also use "petite" to describe Balor, right?)

I also never understood how anyone besides children could take his "demon king" persona seriously. May be I just haven't seen it much, but I'd assume you need size, presence and conviction to play the deranged Mankind like Mick Foley did, and Undertaker like Mark Callaway did. I just refuse to buy a very tiny person pretending to be a Demon. (Oh, and then there's Kane as well. Imagine X-pac being given the role of "Kane" instead!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by d_henderson1810 View Post
Mahal is just an attempt for Vince to tap into the 1 billion population Indian market. How else do you explain a jobber who lost a pre-WM Battle Royal by being eliminated by an NFL player who wasn't even in the match a month earlier?( Here's an idea. Have Jinder win the Andre Royal, and make it mean something, like the winner gets a No. 1 contendership).
I was sort of hopeful a few months ago and anticipated Mahal's win, but now I can safely say- Jinder Mahal as WWE champion is as abominable as it gets. He wouldn't even be a good US champion because Rusev and KO are far better at playing the foreign heel and being champions, besides also being much better in the ring.

Please hinder Jinder!
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-14-2017, 03:08 PM
RomanfreakinReigns's Avatar
RomanfreakinReigns RomanfreakinReigns is offline
Registered User
Knockout Champion
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 736
RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...RomanfreakinReigns worked a dark match on ECW recently...
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Perfect Max View Post
I rejoiced when they merged the titles in late 2013 because the reality is that only one world title was needed where there was no roster split. I'd say that based on the way that WWE has attempted to book it's world champions, maybe they can't cope with two right now.
I rejoiced too! Albeit not until late 2015 as I had stopped watching before that, and I finally connected with Reigns, and it was all good, even with HHH and Sheamus feuding with him, and it got so much better when Reigns and Styles tore the house down, and Seth returned. It was all so good.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Perfect Max View Post
But, I think if WWE was to revert back to one world title, the brand split would be cheapend even more than it already has been. Whether it is necessary at this point, I'm not sure. But if WWE perhaps actually thought about what they were doing when they have these shakeups or drafts, then it wouldn't necessarily be a problem and already ready world title contenders would be present on the show. After all, during the first brand split, I didn't see it as a problem.
They certainly won't revert back to it anytime soon, unless something drastic happens.

It seems obvious the draft/roster split this time around wasn't that thought-out beforehand, but rushed, and they had far less talent and major players than last time around.

It's obvious they don't have that many people on a roster to contend for two men's main titles, and so if you involve Styles and KO even in a lengthy feud for the US title, and you rush a bland recently debuted Corbin, Nakamura, and the godforsaken Jinder Mahal into the WWE title picture, the whole structure will collapse, sooner or later.

Even Orton seems to have lost much of his appeal, and at this point, including him in the WWE title picture lends little gravitas, and you can't count Rusev either.


Quote:
Originally Posted by The Perfect Max View Post
I think if WWE had retained just the one world champion, and unless it was AJ Styles or maybe Kevin Owens, they would undoubtedly be someone on Raw right now. Braun Strowman and Roman Reigns come to mind immediately. Though I'm glad they are holding off Strowman a little bit longer. Perhaps Samoa Joe could be in that conversation sooner rather than later. Then of course you have Seth Rollins. And then the free agent John Cena. Ultimately though, I think the landscape of WWE would be very different.
Agreed. We would've perhaps had a strong set of contenders in the title hunt in Roman Reigns, AJ Styles, Rollins, Kevin Owens, Samoa Joe, to a lesser extent, part-timers Cena and Lesnar, and still as future possibilities- Strowman, Ambrose, Wyatt, or Rusev.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 PM.

monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"
Contact Us - Clear Cookies - Lost Password - WrestleZone Forums - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Top - AdChoices