WWE & TNA Forum
Wrestling News
Loading...


Go Back   WrestleZone Forums > Wrestling - Non Spam Sections > Old School Wrestling
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Arcade vBookie

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-17-2015, 01:02 PM
SSJPhenom's Avatar
SSJPhenom SSJPhenom is offline
The Phenom of WZ
WCW TV Champion
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Age: 29
Posts: 1,741
SSJPhenom scored a win over Santino Marella...SSJPhenom scored a win over Santino Marella...SSJPhenom scored a win over Santino Marella...SSJPhenom scored a win over Santino Marella...SSJPhenom scored a win over Santino Marella...SSJPhenom scored a win over Santino Marella...SSJPhenom scored a win over Santino Marella...SSJPhenom scored a win over Santino Marella...SSJPhenom scored a win over Santino Marella...SSJPhenom scored a win over Santino Marella...SSJPhenom scored a win over Santino Marella...
Send a message via MSN to SSJPhenom
Default Was The Undertaker Really That Important?

This week on the WWE Network is the much talked about Undertaker week. Yesterday, I watched the Legends With JBL show and they said something that really caught my attention. They (JBL, Austin, HBK, and HHH) all said that in 1995, if ‘Taker had have jumped ship along with Nash, Hall, and others that the WWE probably would’ve went under and that they wouldn’t be having the discussion that they were having. So I started wondering; Was ‘Taker really that important to the success of the WWE?

At first, when I thought about this prospect, I was thinking that; no, ‘Taker wasn’t that important. Look, you won’t find a bigger ‘Taker fan than me, however, I’m not a blind ‘Taker mark. ‘Taker was never the #1 guy in the WWE. He was always a top tier guy that could be put into the main event at any time, but he was never the undisputed guy. During that period of time, it was Bret Hart and HBK that were the ones carrying the company. ‘Taker was definitely a main stay, but he wasn’t as important to the company’s success as those two. Then, I gave this idea a little more thought. I had to think about what would’ve really happened had ‘Taker jumped ship in the mid 90’s. First, and this is arguable, there wouldn’t have been a Mankind and by extension there wouldn’t have been Cactus Jack, Dude Love, or Mick Foley. Sure, Mankind may have still been introduced, however, would he have gotten over as well as he did when he debuted if there was no Undertaker? Remember, the night after WM 12 was when Mankind debuted and that was the night that he started his feud with ‘Taker. They had a great feud in 96, then in 97 after ‘Taker had won the title at WM 13 they had another great feud and let us not forget what they done in 98 with their famous HIAC match. So without ‘Taker, would Foley have gotten over as big as he did? I don’t think so. Also, if there’s no Foley, who then is going to be that perfect foil for the Rock to get over with as a heel when the Rock finally became WWE Champion? Makes you think; doesn’t it? Also, and this one is not arguable, if there is no ‘Taker then there damn sure wouldn’t have been a Kane. I don't really know if that effects WWE in a huge way or not, but it’s a point worth mentioning. So right there, if you take away ‘Taker, you take away three of the WWE’s main stays during the Attitude Era. Possibly four because no Foley, maybe no Corporate Rock. There also wouldn’t have been the Ministry/Corporate Ministry of Darkness either during the Attitude Era. So without ‘Taker, several main storylines of the Attitude Era wouldn’t have happened. Also, let’s say that WWE did survive the Monday Night Wars without ‘Taker; the biggest thing that his absence would have definitely given us after the Monday Night Wars would have been no Streak. Would some of those Wrestlemanias have done as well as they did without the Streak and all those classic Streak matches? I could also speculate that the WWE Locker Room wouldn’t have been as cohesive as it has been all of these years without ‘Taker, but that’s behind the scenes stuff and none of us really know what goes on behind the scenes.

So what do you guys think? Was ‘Taker really that important to the success of the WWE? Would they have won the Monday Night Wars if he had of jumped ship with the rest in the mid 90’s? How would his absence have affected the WWE? Let me know your opinions.
__________________
Credit: Theo

Quote:
Originally Posted by NightShiftLegend View Post
Thus why I'd let a girl put on a strap-on and get in there. You only live once.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-17-2015, 01:23 PM
FlairFan2003 FlairFan2003 is offline
Registered User
ROH Pure Champion
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,581
FlairFan2003 worked a dark match on ECW recently...FlairFan2003 worked a dark match on ECW recently...FlairFan2003 worked a dark match on ECW recently...FlairFan2003 worked a dark match on ECW recently...FlairFan2003 worked a dark match on ECW recently...FlairFan2003 worked a dark match on ECW recently...FlairFan2003 worked a dark match on ECW recently...FlairFan2003 worked a dark match on ECW recently...FlairFan2003 worked a dark match on ECW recently...FlairFan2003 worked a dark match on ECW recently...FlairFan2003 worked a dark match on ECW recently...
Default

Taker's character was such that he didn't fit as a long term World Champion....he was great chasing a title but never worked holding it for real long time. Part of that was the appeal of how hard it was to beat him. Dusty Rhodes was terrific at rallying fans behind the beleaguered underdog character but he didn't fit as "the top dog".....his greatest strength was as the everyman underdog chasing the big bad bullies, he would beat them in money matches to please the fans but he didn't feel the same way as a long term champion. That doesn't mean Dusty wasn't integral to the NWA success in the 1980s, he was a huge part of it and nationally it was hard other than Hogan to find a fan favorite with a bigger following than Dusty.

Taker for most of his career has always been at the top of the card. His matches and feuds, especially after about 1996 or so, were always in the top 2 or 3 biggest at any given time. He main evented against just about every top name you can think of and wrestled virtually every major super star in the top 2 or 3 matches on a consistent basis. Hogan....Austin.....Rock.....HBK......HHH......Fla ir......Orton......Batista......Foley.....Lesnar.. ....pretty consistently for the last twenty years Taker has been involved storyline wise at or near the very top of the card with virtually every big name you can think of during that time frame. Lets not forget Brett Hart in the list, or CM Punk either.

Anyone who can consistently be that high up in storyline prominence, working with that many top stars (guys who were either giants at the time they fought or all time HOF greats, some both) over that many years is definitely important.

Longevity is important and few stars have maintained that kind of drawing power for that many years. You're into Hogan & Flair territory when you talk about guys who maintained enough of a following that they could draw well near the top of the card for that many years. That's a legacy few performers can lay claim on, but Taker can.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-17-2015, 01:28 PM
relentless1's Avatar
relentless1 relentless1 is offline
G.O.A.T.
WWE Diva's Champion
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 504
relentless1 is looking to come up from OCW...relentless1 is looking to come up from OCW...relentless1 is looking to come up from OCW...
Default

no, I don't think that Taker was as important to WWF as he's made out to be. i read somewhere that Vince intended on Undertaker replacing Andre as the Feds resident featured attraction and if thats the case id say they missed the mark. Don't get me wrong, I love Undertaker, great gimmick, good matches and from what I've seen he's a good guy behind the scenes as well. But don't think for a second that he can be named in the same breath as Austin, Rock, Flair and Hogan as an irreplaceable guy or something. The WWE has confused fans with their propaganda regarding guys like Taker, HHH and HBK somehow being in the top echelon of greatest of all time when thats not even close.

Last edited by relentless1 : 11-17-2015 at 01:35 PM.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-17-2015, 02:12 PM
tak161's Avatar
tak161 tak161 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 124
tak161 is looking to come up from OCW...tak161 is looking to come up from OCW...tak161 is looking to come up from OCW...
Default

Honestly, I think he is that important to the company, but not in the way most would think. He was an integral part of the roster, remaining a top of the card performer for his entire run. However, I think his most important contribution was backstage. Taker is the guy everyone else turned to in the locker room. Just as Austin, HHH, HBK, and JBL said, Unndertaker was the leader of the locker room and the one guy you went to if you were having a problem, needed to talk, or to make sure you were doing what you should be doing and doing it right.

Now, if you take that away with him jumping to WCW, then you lose the man that everyone looked to. The guy that kept morale up when things were looking bad. Without Taker, the entire company would be without its backstage leader. HBK said that walking into the locker room and seeing Taker, knowing he was there made him feel at home. And if he walked in and didn't see Taker, he wouldn't want to be there. I think that says everything you need to know. Taker is the constant, the measuring stick, and the backbone of WWE, and without him, the WWE would be in a bad place, if not out of business altogether.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-17-2015, 02:35 PM
OYDK's Avatar
OYDK OYDK is offline
Registered User
ECW TV Champion
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 2,204
OYDK is going to make some noise in the draft...OYDK is going to make some noise in the draft...OYDK is going to make some noise in the draft...OYDK is going to make some noise in the draft...OYDK is going to make some noise in the draft...OYDK is going to make some noise in the draft...OYDK is going to make some noise in the draft...OYDK is going to make some noise in the draft...OYDK is going to make some noise in the draft...OYDK is going to make some noise in the draft...OYDK is going to make some noise in the draft...
Default

If we're basing our answers on the time period, than in the one that you're talking about (mid-90s) Taker was VERY important to the WWE. Before that they had Hogan and Savage and the rest, afterwards they had Austin, Rock and the rest, but at this time there was literally just Bret, Shawn, and Taker and Shawn was nowhere near a made man at this point. I think people forget how over Taker was in 1995. His reactions were always right up there with Shawn and Bret and sometime surpassed them. I think saying that the business may have gone under had Taker jumped ship is a legitimate argument. They wouldn't have had anybody, literally anybody but Shawn and Bret to draw people in.

So, Taker was very important to the WWE in the mid-90s. Before and after, the rosters were so deep that they didn't have to rely on him as much, but at this time, he was a crucial element in the wars.
__________________
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-17-2015, 03:04 PM
Chicago1989's Avatar
Chicago1989 Chicago1989 is offline
Ain't it sleep first then eat?
WWE Diva's Champion
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Norwalk, CT
Age: 28
Posts: 445
Chicago1989 is looking to come up from OCW...Chicago1989 is looking to come up from OCW...Chicago1989 is looking to come up from OCW...
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tak161 View Post
Honestly, I think he is that important to the company, but not in the way most would think. He was an integral part of the roster, remaining a top of the card performer for his entire run. However, I think his most important contribution was backstage. Taker is the guy everyone else turned to in the locker room. Just as Austin, HHH, HBK, and JBL said, Unndertaker was the leader of the locker room and the one guy you went to if you were having a problem, needed to talk, or to make sure you were doing what you should be doing and doing it right.

Now, if you take that away with him jumping to WCW, then you lose the man that everyone looked to. The guy that kept morale up when things were looking bad. Without Taker, the entire company would be without its backstage leader. HBK said that walking into the locker room and seeing Taker, knowing he was there made him feel at home. And if he walked in and didn't see Taker, he wouldn't want to be there. I think that says everything you need to know. Taker is the constant, the measuring stick, and the backbone of WWE, and without him, the WWE would be in a bad place, if not out of business altogether.
I think about what you said and just imagine if Undertaker left WWE. He was regarded as the one guy that kept everyone in check and if he wasn't around, you would've had WCW 2.0 happen in the locker room: Egos would've gotten out of control, the inmates would've ran the asylum, etc.

Undertaker was never thought of to being the biggest draw in WWE history, but knowing that he helped shape the course of WWF's/WWE's future in such a big way, he, to me, has that distinction that if he never was around, the WWF/E wouldn't be where it is today. Like you said, he was the backbone.
__________________
The Ruthless Aggression Era is back!.....sort of.

Last edited by Chicago1989 : 11-17-2015 at 03:06 PM.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-17-2015, 03:39 PM
whoopin' ass whoopin' ass is offline
Registered User
WWE Women's Champion
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 997
whoopin' ass is looking to come up from OCW...whoopin' ass is looking to come up from OCW...whoopin' ass is looking to come up from OCW...whoopin' ass is looking to come up from OCW...whoopin' ass is looking to come up from OCW...whoopin' ass is looking to come up from OCW...
Default

He was for consistency. From Hogan to Cena, Taker was there so he became a cornerstone of the company. The catch with that though is because he stayed, he was protected and given opportunities that others weren't. Think back over the past 25 years and there is no real time that Taker jumps out at you - he wasn't a huge part of the Monday Night Wars or the Attitude Era. Sure, there was the higher power angle with him but really, that was a part of Vince and Austin fighting. That kind of sums up is career to me - always involved in the bigger angles but not the main part of them. Personally, I don't feel that he was that important in general. There was never any worry that the company would be in trouble when Taker took time off like with others such as Austin. He stepped back the last few years and there was no major issues within wwe. You can very easily look back over wwe history and skip over him and still tell a pretty complete history of wwe which you couldn't do with a lot of other guys like Austin or HBK.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-17-2015, 05:35 PM
Azane Azane is offline
Registered User
WWF Hardcore Champion
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,182
Azane worked a dark match on ECW recently...Azane worked a dark match on ECW recently...Azane worked a dark match on ECW recently...Azane worked a dark match on ECW recently...Azane worked a dark match on ECW recently...Azane worked a dark match on ECW recently...Azane worked a dark match on ECW recently...Azane worked a dark match on ECW recently...Azane worked a dark match on ECW recently...Azane worked a dark match on ECW recently...Azane worked a dark match on ECW recently...
Default

around 95', WWF didnt have many stars, Taker was carrying the company at some points.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-17-2015, 06:56 PM
Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D.'s Avatar
Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. is online now
Kamehamehaaaaa!!
WWF Hardcore Champion
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece
Age: 21
Posts: 1,192
Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...Deoxyribonucleic A.C.I.D. scored a win over Santino Marella...
Default

Undertaker was something like Bray Wyatt is now in his early stages: a big guy with a very special gimmick that, during the Golden Era and the early New Generation Era, worked really well, since wrestling was still kayfabe back then. He wasn't a main eventer yet.

However when the New Gen Era came and all the stars from the old mega stars from the Golden Era had left, WWE needed new stars to fill the void: HBK, Bret Hart & Diesel. Then at WM 13, with Michaels' injured and Nash in WCW, there was noone else. Enter The Undertaker. That's when Taker really became a main event star.

Given his size, look and mic skills he instantly became a draw. He was a top attraction until 1999 where he took a backseat to the likes of Austin, Rock, Triple H and Foley.

Judging from how he was booked during the Attitude Era, the company never really intended Undertaker to be a big star. He just had to fill a void and turned out to be great.

His ultimate peak came in 2002 where he trully was the top dog, now that Austin & Rock had both gone, but the throne would be a short-lived one, since Lesnar came into play. Again, the company doesn't intend for Taker to be the man, as he wrestles in the upper mid card scene, not winning any World Ttiles, until 2007. From 2007 till 2010 Taker would dominate the main event scene. That's when Vince realized that Undertaker=Money.

Yes you can argue that he wasn't all that special. But keeping a permanent position in the main event scene for 20+ years is really something. He wasn't the MAN, but he was there when they needed him.

However, his biggest work was what he did backstage. He was a locker room leader. He stood up to Michaels' Kliq. Had he gone, the WWF would be left at the mercy of HBK. He was the one that kept the balance between HBK & Vince. Wrestlemania 14's incident where he threatens HBK to drop the belt to Austin proves my point.
That's the biggest reason he was so important back then.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-17-2015, 07:26 PM
rmp0012002 rmp0012002 is offline
Registered User
WWE Diva's Champion
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 551
rmp0012002 is looking to come up from OCW...rmp0012002 is looking to come up from OCW...rmp0012002 is looking to come up from OCW...rmp0012002 is looking to come up from OCW...
Default

He was important but not as the top face of the company but as a huge attraction with fans. He just had that connection with the fans due to his character and he didn't have to be the main event to get that reaction from the fans.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 PM.

monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"
Contact Us - Clear Cookies - Lost Password - WrestleZone Forums - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Top - AdChoices