Who is the worse wrestler? Snitsky or The Great Khali

[Soul Reaper]

Me and My friend were playing Smackdown vs Raw 2008 and we simulated a match between Snitsky and The Great Khali. The Great Khali won and my friend likes The Great Khali. I told him the Khali sucks so he got mad at me and said that he is better than Snitsky so who is the worst out of these two.


I hate them both and think that they can't wrestle for crap. Why hasn't the WWE released Snitsky I understand Khali he is popular in India, but why keep Snitsky he is a talentless yellow toothed loser IMO.

[IrishEnglishman24]

Snitsky's just a big guy. easy to find, easy to replace. try replacing a 7'3 450lb monster. yeah, he can't wrestle, but he's a total monster. add to that he's marketable and you've the reason why wwe havent actually got rid of him.

Khali's in ring ability's not as important as the fact he's a guaranteed storyline, convincing as a monster and that works

I STRONGLY agree snitsky is the worst although along with many pieces of crap who get too much tv time like Khali big daddy V mark henry jim duggan ( NEVER understood why he even had a job can't do anything) that stupid 50 's team who don't sell at all and now mike knox why batista was pushed also perplexes me I understand the backstage politics but HE is not good either and doesnt deserve the right to be in the main events like he is especially cause he is so arrogant and thinks he's HHH. Its funny that great talented wrestlers like super crazy charlie haas little guido (fuck nunzio) jimmy yang shannon moore cody rhodes london and kendrick get shafted because they arsenal doesn't consist of chops and a power slam and will always bother me that they never ever will be pushed and instead will be stuck with the worst gimmicks making these pieces of crap look good which is really hard to do and now tna is following the same pattern having the x division and their tag teams (the best wrestlers in the co) become obsolete and it's all about HH.. KURT squashing everyone

[AnthonyMango/NoFate007]

Khali is worse by leagues, but that in no way is me saying that Snitsky is good. Snitsky is merely the lesser of two evils.

Maneuverability - Snitsky outclasses Khali, as Khali can barely walk, but Snitsky is able to even go over the top rope, take some falls, etc.

Move List - Both are bad, but I can't even name 10 moves that Khali does...let alone does without being awkward. He has what, the elbow in the corner, the nerve hold, the choke bomb, the chop to the head, and a big boot? Is that it?

Mic Skills - At least Snitsky speaks English.

Versatility - Snitsky can be beaten by more mean "believably" than Khali, so that allows him more flexibility when it comes to a push. I don't think either man deserves any kind of a push, but if I had to pick, I'd rather see a Snitsky feud than a Khali feud.

[L4L]

They are both horrible but Mark Henry is the worst wrestler in the WWE right now. How many times can the WWE try to push a guy only to have to back off of it due to a man inability to perform any halfway decent move other than a bodyslam. Henry as much as I would like to see him get a monster push he can't because he is so bad worse than Khali or Snitsky

[josh [-4-]]

Both suck, but i think that if cena was added to that poll he would win. Cena is the worst wrestler ever. Their doing a great job making cena like hogan: they both can't wrestle. But hulk could do a promo worth listening too, instead of cena trying to be like the rock trying to say funny stuff.

[Lithium66]

This is a tough i like both i see alot of talent in both just need to be used for their strong points.

Khali cant wrestle one bit and bad at selling or even gettin hit in the face.just the fact he is so big and got a big fanbase that some people cant understand that.my way is to learn more moves n sell more.


With Snitsky he can wrestle more better had more moves, sells etc.just the gimmick not working at first the gimmick his style suit guess the writers has mess up with this one went over people too much and rush everything now hes back where he started beatin small people and gettin whoop by bigger names.

So my pick is Khail because the selling and movement

[IrishEnglishman24]

Originally Posted by NoFate007

Mic Skills - At least Snitsky speaks English.

Versatility - Snitsky can be beaten by more mean "believably" than Khali, so that allows him more flexibility when it comes to a push. I don't think either man deserves any kind of a push, but if I had to pick, I'd rather see a Snitsky feud than a Khali feud.

Yokozuma didn't speak english and was successful, Umaga's gimmick has him not speaking english, Undertaker doesn't cut promos beyond rest in peace and challenging to a match, Kane's gimmick had him unable to speak for years, that's why he has a mouthpiece. besides, he can speak english, you just can't make it out clearly (see the longest yard for what i mean)

Khali cant wrestle one bit and bad at selling or even gettin hit in the face.just the fact he is so big and got a big fanbase that some people cant understand that.my way is to learn more moves n sell more.

also, why should a guy that size be expected to sell much. he's like a tree and it's all part of that gimmick that he's a giant, same way taker doesn't sell because of the gimmick that he can recover.

with snitsky being smaller, it's easier to believe that a punch to the face would have an effect

[Lithium66]

Lol undertaker does sell and one of the great's at doing it.

now Khail needs take more punches remeber when he was taking some shot from hogan and lance strom said that hogan one of the safes at punching so he should all to let it connect.I do like khail last raw was good and how king said he blocking them punches that a good reason to explan it.im not saying he should let mid carders making him look weak just allow the punch to connect he dont have to sell it just take it.

[HBK-aholic]

They're both awful wrestlers. Neither of them do much for the WWE and they have very few, if any fans. They get limited crowd reaction and can't wrestle for toffee.

Snitsky - Sorry, but is it just me who still sees him as the "It wasn't my fault" Kane and Lita baby murderer? That storyline was awful, he was crap and there was no skill in it. Now? He can't even sell us a new gimmick. His faults are endless, and he's one of few wrestlers I can see nothing good in. And I can always see good in wrestlers.

Khali - He's big. The sole reason he is in the WWe at the moment. However watching him wrestle makes me wonder why I like the company so much. He can't move in the ring. He has no mic work. His matches are always bad. I think I've seen about 2 'good', involving HBK and Cena, and they were the reasons for the improvement in the match, not him. He doesn't use size as an advantage, something wrestlers of his size have to do. Their size means they can't wrestle like someone such as Benoit.

I voted for Khali, simply because he actually offers nothing to the WWE. I see no reason for him, and the majority of fans agree.