Women's nipples are now a felony

[H33LTurn]

Originally Posted by Slyfox696

They may have been held equally accountable, but only one of them was responsible. The woman.

The Book of Genesis is sexist. The Bible is sexist. The Bible has no place in this discussion.

She was responsible, because she grabbed the apple but whatever. You dont want to talk about the Bible, I dont want to talk about the Bible, lets drop it then.

Then call it sexist. Which is what it is.

Sexism is a prejudice against someone based on their gender. Theres nothing prejudice about understanding what breasts mean to people in the 21st century.

Again, I come back to that society does not matter when discussing equality. Just like when the majority of society thought of black people as inferior didn't matter, the "billions" of people (which, by the way, I disagree with completely, but asking you to source anything would be a waste of time) who may think this law is okay doesn't matter.

Slavery was racist. This law is sexist. Whether people are in favor of the law has no bearing on the fact it is sexist.

You're creating an outrage where there isnt one. Both responsible men and women understand that this law is necessary. Women are willing to give up the right to be topless because they realize the effects of that. That is largely different from a group of people being sold, taken to a foreign land against their will, and enslaved for 500 years.

I imagine, to you, most things are hard to understand.

Only when you're the one mentioning them.

There is no allegedly about it, that's exactly what they do.

According to you.

Some women do, a loud fuss even. Why should their equality be marginalized?

Just because a minority is loud, it doesnt mean that their point of view is worth addressing. Theres a group of people making a loud fuss about making a national holiday for Randy Savage. Of course those people are batshit crazy so their opinions dont matter.

[Slyfox696]

Originally Posted by H33LTurn

Sexism is a prejudice against someone based on their gender. Theres nothing prejudice about understanding what breasts mean to people in the 21st century.

Even you aren't buying your load of shit anymore.

You already acquiesced it was prejudiced against women. You said it here:

Originally Posted by H33LTurn

I'm not denying that this law targets one gender but not the other.

You're creating an outrage where there isnt one.

Sexism should be an outrage.

Both responsible men and women understand that this law is necessary.

I would LOVE to hear why this law is "necessary". Keep in mind the difference between the terms "desired" and "necessary".

Please tell me how this sexist law is necessary.

Only when you're the one mentioning them.

So you agree your level of intelligence is far beneath mine. At least you finally have understood something.

According to you.

And the definitions of the words themselves.

Just because a minority is loud, it doesnt mean that their point of view is worth addressing.

You're right, after all, blacks were a minority, so why bother addressing the inequality which blacks were subjected to?

Again, your words fall flat.

Theres a group of people making a loud fuss about making a national holiday for Randy Savage. Of course those people are batshit crazy so their opinions dont matter.

I agree.

Then again, they're not arguing for equality. I, and many others, are. Big difference.

[H33LTurn]

Originally Posted by Slyfox696

Even you aren't buying your load of shit anymore.

You already acquiesced it was prejudiced against women. You said it here:

Yes, and I'll share that load with all the other mentally stable people who get my point. You and the feminist lobby can bitch and moan, because tomorrow morning will just be another day where a woman cant walk out her door with her tits out. See heres the thing with lobbying: you get your 15 minutes of fame, you satisfy your messiah complex, but at the end of the day the adults make the laws.

Sexism should be an outrage.

Hmm, telling women they should be mad about something they're not mad about. Yeah, and I'm the one force feeding people.

I would LOVE to hear why this law is "necessary". Keep in mind the difference between the terms "desired" and "necessary".

Im not even going to go into this one. Your mother didnt raise you to understand what behavior is obscene and why its wrong. I'm not going to to that for you now.

So you agree your level of intelligence is far beneath mine. At least you finally have understood something.

No, I admitt that you're talking complete nonsense, so I, like MOST people, do not understand your point of view on this issue.

And the definitions of the words themselves.

Nope, because wearing a shirt is in no way shape or form a burden or cruel punishment.

You're right, after all, blacks were a minority, so why bother addressing the inequality which blacks were subjected to?

Again, your words fall flat.

A minority being cruely punished for 500 years? they deserve to be heard. A couple of people who want to be rebels, nope. The thing about the toplessness lobby is that its all about attention. Women know how men react to their breasts. They want to start a ruckus for the sake of starting a ruckus, and I'm having no part in that.

[Slyfox696]

Originally Posted by H33LTurn

Yes, and I'll share that load with all the other mentally stable people who get my point. You and the feminist lobby can bitch and moan, because tomorrow morning will just be another day where a woman cant walk out her door with her tits out.

You've clearly lost. You already admitted it was a sexist law. It's prejudiced against women. You're trying to reframe the issue (for some unknown issue), but you've lost.

It's a sexist law, no matter how you wish to trivialize the truth.

You lose.

but at the end of the day the adults make the laws.

So says Stupid Boy, the child who cannot legally buy cigarettes.

Im not even going to go into this one. Your mother didnt raise you to understand what behavior is obscene and why its wrong. I'm not going to to that for you now.

No no, please do. Please explain why the breasts are such an offense to nature this law was NECESSARY.

I'll wait, Stupid Boy.

Nope, because wearing a shirt is in no way shape or form a burden or cruel punishment.

But it is unjust to require women and not men. Which was part of the definition. You're way too young for your memory to be failing you already, Stupid Boy.

The thing about the toplessness lobby is that its all about attention. Women know how men react to their breasts. They want to start a ruckus for the sake of starting a ruckus, and I'm having no part in that.

And NOW we can to the REAL reason this law was enacted.

This law was not enacted for any of the reasons you mentioned, this law was enacted to "shut women up", to remove one of the ways women have their political voices heard. This is entirely about suppressing an effective form of political dissent.

You see, I've known this all along. And I could have told you early, but I seriously doubt you even understand it now.

So here's the deal. You're obviously far too stupid to understand how you have torpedoed your own argument. You clearly don't know the definitions of words. So, since this thread long ago outlived its usefulness, and any hope I had of you no longer being stupid is effectively extinguished, I'm going to close this thread.

I wish I could say it's been fun, Stupid Boy, but the fact is it saddens me that people as dumb as you actually exist. Go have fun with the other children now, Stupid Boy.