![]() |
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Give him the Crazy Train pec dancing gimmick, while he builds a smark following that hates the gimmick but likes him. The gimmick will eventually run it's course on all three shows, take him off TV for a while and repackage him as a pissed-off Chris Mordetsky who is mad about selling out his dignity for the fans.
__________________
Yes, I am currently the world's biggest mark for myself. But I am taking applications. "Who will be at Wrestlemania in 2014?" That question should drive everything WWE does. "Will there be a Bound For Glory in 2011, post-Hogan?" That is my question about TNA. |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
His style is slow and all, and who knows maybe he'll find a way to pick it up. Also, the guy has had really no time to speak on the mic yet since his return, so we can't bash him there yet. His performance last night was indeed funny though and it won't launch him anywhere, but it is noteworthy and hopefully we can see another side to Masters' persona down the road.
__________________
Don't Hunt What You Can't Kill!!! http://forums.wrestlezone.com/images/smilies/guns.gif
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have a question that perhaps hasn't been considered.
Based on Chris Masters actions last night, and because I can clearly see that the segment has garnered mostly positive reviews from everyone ... do you all think that perhaps it's time for "The Masterpiece" persona to vanquish? Maybe it's time to push Masters in a new direction, being that of a Face? It's difficult because WWE grants very little mic time (if any at all) to anyone not in the Main Event. Therefore, it's hard to tell if there is a whole boat load of people that are missing their calling with taking their characters in a new direction. But does anyone think Chris Masters may actually have potential with being a Face if he is given a new character and personality?
__________________
A "WWE Shareholder" is not so much a true fan of wrestling, as they are a blind, devout follower of Vince McMahon. In essence, a "WWE Shareholder" is more concerned with seeing Vince McMahon happy as opposed to seeing themselves happy by what personally entertains them as fans. They readily put Vince's corporate interests ahead of their own interests as fans, are spoon-fed to accept anything and everything, and are hazardous to the very health of the wrestling business. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Down the road, the pec-dancing could evolve into a larger "lady-killer" character, either face or heel. Mabel/Viscera is not filling that spot any more, Steiner is doing it in TNA for a little while, but maybe Masters could play the old Rick Rude womanizer role. He doesn't even have to drop the Masterpiece tag. Down the road, if his role grows, the narcissist gimmick meshes well with the ladykiller gimmick.
__________________
Yes, I am currently the world's biggest mark for myself. But I am taking applications. "Who will be at Wrestlemania in 2014?" That question should drive everything WWE does. "Will there be a Bound For Glory in 2011, post-Hogan?" That is my question about TNA. Last edited by johnbragg : 11-03-2009 at 04:41 PM. |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But the fact that he wouldn't get any time on the mic would be very very bad. It's easier to be a heel and not get any mic time since all you have to do is beat up the fan favorites to get heat. I think it's harder to be a face and not get any mic time, since you have to make the crowd get behind you without being allowed to talk. The idea of him being given a new personality also frightens me, just because WWE seems to be so against gimmicks now that this new personality would be probably similar to Mark Henry's - a dude who smiles a lot, so he's a good guy now. And if they don't go that route than they'll probably turn Masters into a comedy jobber. I'd die a little inside if they started teaming him up with Santino. Unless they give him mic time and/or a non-generic face gimmick, I don't think Masters would get over. He doesn't wrestle a fast-paced match like somebody like Kofi does, so being a generic face who never cuts any promos isn't going to cut it. Given time on the mic, I think Masters would get over as a face. But given WWE's past record, I don't think he'd get any time on the mic. So I would be against him turning face.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Yes, I am currently the world's biggest mark for myself. But I am taking applications. "Who will be at Wrestlemania in 2014?" That question should drive everything WWE does. "Will there be a Bound For Glory in 2011, post-Hogan?" That is my question about TNA. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hmm I didn't see the pec dancing thing, but I mean c'mon it seems like the type of thing that would get old pretty quick and the gimmick has jobber written all over it. I don't think the WWE needs any more pointless comedy figures.
On Master's though, I really haven't seen him wrestle much since he debuted the first time and I didn't mind him then. If they just let him come to the ring and dominate some heels I bet he'd get over, I mean really whenever someone dominates someone in the ring it gets them over. Goldberg, Umaga, Lesnar, Austin(maybe not in the ring but when he wasn't having matches he definately dominated everyone else), hell look at the difference between Shamus VS Noble last week and this week. Last week he had a boring match and everyone hated it. This week he just beat the crap out of Noble and the crowd hated(really they loved it)him for it. Make Masters look like a winner and he'll be a winner. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
(By the way, I am definitely a Masters mark. He has been held back for too long. Give him a chance WWE!!) |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Unless you were talking about your gimmick idea that you brought up in a few of your posts. That wouldn't be a generic gimmick. But if you were talking about him simply continuing the pec movement stuff then I really don't see how that could turn out being anything other than a comedy gimmick, eventually a comedy-jobber gimmick. If he turns face, anyway. If he were to stay heel then it wouldn't be at all a change from his Masterpiece gimmick since it would still be a narcissistic thing. It's not like it was the first time he did the pec movement thing, or that he debuted some new gimmick - he used to do it before his matches back during his first run in WWE. He just did it ridiculously during the Raw's Got Talent for a comedy segment, and it was pretty funny.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I dunno I mean doesn't he already flex his pecs a lot when he wrestles anyway? If he made a weird dance routine out of it I struggle to see a way that it doesn't come off goofy. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|