![]() |
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
just a thought... what if Punk goes against Taker at wrestlemania? he never loose by the Deadman, and we are not sure we'll have Brock Lesnar vs Taker...
Think about it: Punk (heel or face doesant' matter) is now a main eventer. At Wrestlemania he can fight only top guys: cena (one more? please no...); the rock (a rematch after royal rumble? possible); tripleH (yet done); stone cold (we'd love it, but we know Austin can't have a real match) or a Smackdown top - Sheamus, Orton, Bryan, Barrett –, but why? and how to build up the match? In my opinion, the best new match he can have at wrestlemania is for the streak. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Punk should hold onto the title until Royal Rumble and drop it to The Rock. He can speak out against proving himself to be worthy of respect for over a year as champion and then having to face The Rock who wrestled once before RR in the last 12 months. Determined to still obtain the respect he deserves, he challenges Undertaker and ends the streak at Mania.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd want to puke if Punk got to end the streak. And I generally don't even care about the hype or excitement about that whole thing anyway. But if there's one guy who doesn't deserve it, it's Punk. Let's stop rewarding the guy who shows no appreciation for anything he has ever gotten and already has the biggest ego in the world. I think his head might burst if he can start walking around saying he ended the streak. If WWE wants to keep rewarding the guy who goes on Twitter and tells fans to commit suicide and punches them in the face at live events, that's just lovely.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|