![]() |
|||
|
|
Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
![]() No it wasn't. Here is a listing of the 2017 WWE PPV events.
Royal Rumble Elimination Chamber Fastlane Wrestlemania 33 Payback Backlash Extreme Rules Money In The Bank Great Balls Of Fire Battleground Summerslam No Mercy Hell In A Cell Tables, Ladders & Chairs Survivor Series Clash of Champions There's a lot of shows on that list. It contains some very good shows and even some bad ones. You know what I do NOT see on there? The Mae Young Classic. Why you might ask? It's not listed amongst the 2017 WWE PPV events because it wasn't a PPV. You can play the "Why because you said so?" card all you want, but that works both ways. The Mae Young Classic does not suddenly become retconned into becoming a PPV just because NorCal said so. The fact of the matter is that it was NOT a PPV. Period. Quote:
Quote:
While I do agree with this being possible, that doesn't change the fact that the tournament did not feature women from WWE. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
To both NorCal and Prophet.... I often enjoy a good debate, guys, but I think we are just going to have to agree to disagree on this one. To everyone else, I rest my case. The WWE has yet to try a PPV (such as "Payback" etc) with only women from its main roster. They have also yet to attempt an all women's NXT Takeover. It has not happened yet because The Mae Young Classic is not a PPV. Until it does happen, we will never know if it would work out or not. I'd be interested in seeing it happen if they tried it due to the history being made.
__________________
Come join the best section on the forum WrestleZone Championship Wrestling! You know you want to! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If they cater to only the Network viewers than an all women event would work but as a traditional standalone event to be purchased outside of the network then no. And if it’s a Network only special then you limit your possible viewers.
|
#33
|
||||||
|
||||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Further....What is different between an all female Takeover and the MYC? Nothing, would be the answer. Quote:
Quote:
A title shot for the winner was always the prize, btw.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by Mighty NorCal : 12-30-2017 at 06:21 PM. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm not sure why the guys are arguing over the MYC being a PPV or not lol. The one guy is right in that it doesn't fit the bill with being a typical monthly PPV/Event, while the other dude is right in the way that PPV's are presented today on the WWE Network, as events, rather than the traditional PPV format. You're both right in what you're saying, so don't be crazy about it. As for an all female PPV/Event. Could it work? Yeah. Absolutely, it could work. An all female PPV is the perfect time to bring back the PPV title, "Badd Blood". I'll see my way out.
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Let's face facts, mate. You are a hypocrite, because you bag me for hating on wrestlers, but the fact is, you don't like me, and that is why you respond to my posts so angrily. Funny thing is, I don't care what you think of me. So, being critical of Asuka is racism is it? Okay, say Asuka was caught drink-driving one time, and was charged by police. If she was disciplined by police, you would probably call them racists too. I mean, you defend wife-beaters like "Stone Cold" Steve Austin, so that says everything about you as a human being. You are a piece of shit mod, and you abuse your power by expecting people to post only what you agree with, or else. I bet you will suspend me, because that is how corrupt turds like you work in society. You think because you are a mod, you have some power. You're a joke, and I am entitled to like who I like, and not like who I don't like (like you, for example), just like you hate on me. I plan on reporting you for overstepping your authority. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
So, now you are again telling people who they should consider important and who they don't. Just because you don't rate the women in the MYC. I bet if Asuka was in the MYC, you would be getting a chubby over it, and wanting everyone to talk about her. But then, unless someone like SCSA, Daniel Bryan, Shinsuke Nakamura, or Asuka, then you don't want them posting here. Funny, I don't know that it was all about you. |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I wouldn’t watch it personally but judging by everyone’s opinion I’m guessing it probably would succeed. I don’t think it could be a monthly thing but a yearly thing then I could go with. I’d probably have an important woman match on there to solidify the PPV like the woman’s MITB or the woman’s Rumble.
I wouldn’t watch it because I just don’t want to make more time for wrestling and having superstars that I don’t care about on a PPV isn’t going to change that. At the end of the day I don’t want to watch the WNBA, I wanna watch the NBA. Sure the WNBA has had legends like Lauren Jackson and Sue Bird and has a lot of talent now like Candice Parker, Tina Charles and Nneka Ok(I don’t know how to spell the rest of the name haha) but I’m picking Lebron James, Kevin Durant and james Harden every day over them. Hell I would even pick watching teams like the Kings and Suns over them. That’s what it’s like for the WWE for me. Watching Sasha kill it against whoever can be awesome to watch but I don’t watch wrestling for her, let alone the woman. I want to see dudes fuck each other up, not woman. I feel like that for UFC as well. I’m not sure an all woman’s UFC PPV would be as successful as normal. Maybe a one off but I wouldn’t say every month.
__________________
![]() Credit to Dave! |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
![]() To be fair, a pay per view doesn't have to have the company's top talent to be called a pay per view. That's getting close to saying a main event isn't the main event because the world title isn't on the line. It would seem beneficial or even a better idea to do so, but the definition of those two things don't change because you feel it isn't as special.
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Are we having an argument over semantics!? GOODY GOODY GOODY!
Pay Per View, what does it mean? In the sense that a Role Playing Game is any game where you play a role, a Pay Per View could be any random nonsense shown on TV in that you've paid money in some kind of way to see it. I grew up with the notion that a Pay Per View was something where you had to *mean gene voice* call your cable company *end of mean gene voice* and pay a fee to watch it. If it wasn't on that special channel that the cable company ran specifically for content that had to be paid for one broadcast at a time, then it wasn't a Pay Per View. This is still done, and is being massively undercut by the WWE network. I don't consider Network Specials to count as PPVs. but the NXT Takeover broadcasts of 2017 have apparently been available on Pay Per View. It's likely a huge step to go from what I would define as being merely a network special like the MYC, to devoting an entire PPV to the potential of the female talent. If it happened; I for one would buy and would likely force myself to enjoy it regardless of how it went down.
__________________
There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so. - Hamlet |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|