WWE vs TNA; who has the better roster?
I created this just for fun and is not meant to create a war of WWE fan boys against TNA fanboys. This is for the real fans who watch both great shows.
Who's roster do you prefer better?
AJ Styles (my fav wrestler)
Eric young( I miss super eric)
Rob van dam
Samoa joe(gonna kill u)
CM Punk (WWE Champion)
Shamus (World Champion)
Santino Marella (US Champion)
Alberto Del Rio
Cody Rhodes (Intercontinental Champion)
The Great Khali
Kofi Kingston (Tag Team Champion)
R-Truth (Tag Team Champion)
Cameron (Clay's dancer)
Layla (Divas Champion)
Naomi (Clay's Dancers)
I believe TNA has the better roster, and its WWEs fault.
WWE has way too many jobbers.
Wos roster do u like better?
Moderaters are low lifes
It is difficult to judge because they are different companies with different approaches towards entertainment. For example, AJ styles is the greatest superstar in the history of TNA - would be a lowly mid-carder in WWE. Not because he isn't talented but because he misses some vital skills that are need to be a star in the WWE.
The WWE roster has far greater depth in my opinion and most of their roster would be big stars in TNA. Guys like Rhodes, Swagger, Barret, Tyson Kidd would be main-eventers in TNA. Conversely, a mid-carder in TNA lets say Robbie E and a lot of the X-division stars would get nowhere in the WWE.
I'm in love with how strikingly original this thread is.
Way to go OP.
As for who has the better roster...
Both have talent, WWE has more by quantity(bigger company with more TV time to fill). Beyond that this is just an opinion thread that will do nothing beyond create the fanboy war you stated you hoped to avoid.
Last edited by Papa Pillman : 02-20-2013 at 12:09 PM.
This is not even a question of opinion. You dont have to be fan of either to know that WWE has the best of the best on their roster. Hell John Cena and the Rock are far more successful entertainers and appeal to many more people than the entire TNA roster. Then you go add Lesner, Taker, HHH and thats icing on the cake. And then you have the full time guys like Punk, Orton, Sheamus, Ryback- how can you even compare the two.
Sure TNA has Hogan- but Hogan alone does not beat the Rock- he may come close very close but Hogan is just not enough.
I would say TNA has the better wrestlers,but they lose by default because they have Hulk Hogan.WWE has a few great wrestlers but Vince don't want wrestlers.some of the problem with TNA is that both have bad mic skills,the booking sucks,and it feels like lucha libre wrestling where spots are forced.
Wow. How generic. Closed.