![]() |
|||
|
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
vs. ![]() Now, this isn't like IC's awesome "Film Throwdown" series, because let's just face facts here.... both Patrick Bateman ("American Psycho") and Alex DeLarge ("A Clockwork Orange") were a couple of pussies at heart who would never, ever fight each other straight up. That said, I do have 3 set of questions regarding these two that I would love to hear everyone's opinion on, who have seen these two great movies. Here they are: 1. Out of Patrick Bateman and Alex DeLarge, who was the more ruthless/violent character? Who had the sicker mind between the two, basically? 2. Who was the more interesting character to you? Which character would you like to learn more about and see where they're at today? 3. Which actor portrayed their character better, Christian Bale as Patrick Bateman, or Malcolm McDowell as Alex DeLarge? Those are the questions I would like to see answered from everyone who has seen both films. So, please, let's hear it ![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Fucking love this thread idea JMT. Considering both of our love for Bret Easton Ellis you can take a wild guess as to who I'm going to go with here. I'm a fan of Anthony Burgess as well so this is a pretty difficult choice, but again, my fanboy-ism for Ellis would make it practically impossible for me to rule against one of his characters.
Quote:
Quote:
Oh wow, I just noticed this thread is in the movies section, I thought we were discussing both characters both in film and in their respective novels. The film version of both characters have a few big differences from their characters in the books, particularly Alex. Quote:
I'll go with Alex here just so it doesn't sound like I'm dumping on A Clockwork Orange, because I loved that novel and film, though you may need a Cockney dictionary to attempt to decipher some of the things said in A Clockwork Orange. Of the two characters though, my vote would go to Patrick Bateman for many of the reasons I've already mentioned.
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
My main gripe about the movie was how it made it clear that Bateman didn't do the murders and what not. Also, the scene with Chloë Sevigny at the end where she reads Patrick's diary or whatever, should never have been in the film because the entire film was supposed to be in Patrick's perspective, and he was nowhere to be seen in that scene, so why was it shown? But anyway, I look at these two characters like this, and I'm assuming a good part of Bateman's actions actually went down (especially since deep down I want to go by the book, on this question). Patrick Bateman needed to kill. He had this blood thirst that just would not go away. Whereas Alex, he did it just for pleasure. It was fun for him. Raping, killing and hurting people.... that all brought a huge smile to Alex's face. He didn't have hatred or disgust for the people he tortured; it just entertained him to torture those people. Patrick, on the other hand, literally hated everyone he killed, even if he didn't know them, and he couldn't control himself from his actions. Now, when you look it as I do... it's hard to pick who was more sick: The person who did it for joy, or someone who just couldn't help himself? It's why I wanted to see what other people had to say on this subject and hopefully we get some more replies. Quote:
If I could have something like ten wishes, I really think one of them would be to get BEE to write a Bateman Brothers book, lol. Let us know where both Patrick and Sean Bateman are at today, and give us a backstory on both men. It'd be the greatest book ever written, lol. Not to say Alex wasn't an interesting/complex soul, but he didn't have nearly as much to offer as Bateman did because there's just so much mystery to Bateman's madness, whereas I think it's clear that Alex was just someone who enjoyed to hurt people. He didn't have a reason other than it was just fun for him. Quote:
The rape scene with Alex on the author's wife where he's singing "Singin' in the Rain" is just such a surreal experience to sit through and you have to give that credit to McDowl's brilliant performance. And then... there's the scene you mentioned with Bateman, with Bale confessing to his lawyer over the phone. I completely agree X that that is some of the greatest acting that has ever taken place. While I would say that there's nothing McDowell does that is as good as the confession scene, overall I would still have to give his performance the nod. He was so damn charismatic in that film, and you just hung off every word and movement the man did. Also, simply the way he carried himself, narrated, and stare into the camera were all beautiful works of art as far as I'm concerned. Not to say Bale didn't have other great scenes outside of the confession to his lawyer. The Business card, the threesome, and the Paul Allen (played wonderfully by one of my favorite actors, Jared Leto) scenes were all fan-fucking-tastic. It's just overall, I don't feel his performance matched the one given by Malcolm McDowell as Alex DeLarge. Though, McDowell did have more to work with, in my opinion. If Mary Harron had the balls of Kubrick and said fuck it and go all out, then perhaps Bale would have been able to match it, but since she didn't... you have to give the edge to McDowell here, in my opinion. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() I'm a bit of a Bale mark, so I want to say him, but everything that McDowell did as DeLarge stands out in my mind. The smile, his eyes...They told more about his character than Bale ever could with a 5 minute dialogue on Bateman. It's a close one, but I'd go with McDowell here.
__________________
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|