Was the feud going into the match good?
This was the main feud going on at the time with Vince trying to keep the belt off Austin. Vince demanded a winner in this match and when that didn't happen Austin was "fired". Good stuff here, never a dull moment is the Austin Vince Saga.
Was the match entertaining?
The match was entertaining, but was more about Austin and Vince than Undertaker and Kane. Not a wrestling clinic by any means, but Kane and Taker did well and Austin added a lot to it.
Was there good story-telling? (Psychology)
I think the main thing we got to see in this match was that Austin did not want the title going to either Taker or Kane. The fact he would be fired if a winner was not determined seemed to not effect Austin's actions in the match at all.
Was there any good spots?
Always liked the Stunner he hit on Taker right before he counted both of their shoulders down.
How was the crowds reaction throughout this match?
The crowd seemed to be into the match throughout.
Length of match? (Was it too short? or too long?, could more time have been added to make the match better? etc.)
I think it got the time it needed. There was no real need to drag the match on as we had the added promo with Austin and Vince at the end.