Recent content by xmulderx

I sort of hope it happens because its a shame that all that is coming from NXT season 2 is one boring star in Kaval. That said, they can't keep fucking doing this. It defeats the point of the competition altogether.

I think you're an idiot. The only reason that Taker isn't every bit as sick as when he hung Big Boss Man after their HIAC match is the PG era. The problem is nothing to do with Taker, its to do with the PG era. At least taker still has some of the drama of his golden (attitude) era... noone else...

There's no point getting a new logo until they start moving away from the PG era. When they do that I imagine they'll want to distance themselves with the current promotion as much as possible and might change it. Otherwise it'd just be a pointless attention seeking bullshit act.

What's up. I'm new. I'm save_us_222's brother.

Miz is only good on NXT and that's because he's barely a pro and giving advice to newbs as though he's a vet.

Mate, this is pretty much all nonsense. Who is better to watch in a ring: Jericho or Cena? Who does WWE intend to be a heel? Who would I pay to go see? Y2J.

It would be fucking sick if that happened. I think its more likely that Taker gets retired this year, though.

I think it is a great idea. It'd give a bit more weight to all the belts and, hopefully, the intercontinental championship would start being worth a shit again! They definitely wouldn't have the same problem with the intercont. as they had with the tag champs (which was not having enough people...

Problems: 1. WWE doesn't listen to the fans just now, so it probably won't guarantee a heel-turn even if Cena is boo'd. 2. WWE will make Cena win by not selling at the end of the match. Orton deserves better If you have a match between the two, despite a possibly cool lead-up, it'll end...

They couldn't get Heyman in time. haha

Women's wrestling sucks so hard these days because its treated by the companies as more of a striptease filler event than a real wrestling match. It sucks.

That's levelling the playing field, nae deciding who is more or less deserving. In fact, I'd argue that the way the government act today discriminates about who they think is most deserving - VAT is higher than proportional tax, so rich and poor both pay the same amount of tax on food etc. So...